MedPath

Comparison of Fast-Absorbing Sutures for Mohs Surgery

Early Phase 1
Conditions
Cicatrix
Interventions
Procedure: Surgical wound closure with superficial absorbable sutures
Registration Number
NCT02334917
Lead Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Brief Summary

This study is being carried out to assess equivalence of scar outcome for two absorbable sutures used for wound closure on the face in dermatologic surgery: rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 (VicrylRapide™) and fast-absorbing plain gut (5-0 fast). This is important because absorbable sutures are commonly used in Mohs surgery for epidermal closure, yet there is no evidence indicating if any of the sutures above allow for a better cosmetic outcome (less erythema, edema, and scarring).

Detailed Description

Prospective randomized controlled split-scar observer-blinded study.

After dermatologic surgery on the face, surgeons have a choice between using non-absorbable or absorbable sutures for skin closure. A dermatologic surgeon favoring absorbable sutures for wound closure will consider many factors in material selection, including ease of manipulation, cost, and absorption time. However, there have been no randomized trials comparing the most important measure: aesthetic/cosmetic outcome.

Study endpoint/outcome: use three validated scar assessment tools.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients who are over 18 years and are having Mohs surgery on the face.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with surgical wounds less than 4cm in length
  • Patients requiring full thickness skin grafts for reconstruction
  • Patients who are unable to attend routine postoperative follow-up appointments
  • Patients who are receiving radiation therapy after surgery.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Absorbable suture closureSurgical wound closure with superficial absorbable suturesPatients will have half of their surgical wound closed using one kind of absorbable superficial sutures, and the other half with a different kind of absorbable superficial suture. Which half receives which suture will be randomly determined.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) score (cosmetic outcome)6 months

In this study we will use three validated scar assessment tools (the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) to assess scar width, height, color, cross-hatching and overall appearance, the Wound Evaluation Scale (WES) to rate scar stepoff, contour irregularity, scar width, edge inversion, and inflammation , and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) to assess overall scar appearance. This will be done at the one-week, two-month and six-month post-operative follow-ups.

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (cosmetic outcome)6 months

In this study we will use three validated scar assessment tools (the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) to assess scar width, height, color, cross-hatching and overall appearance, the Wound Evaluation Scale (WES) to rate scar stepoff, contour irregularity, scar width, edge inversion, and inflammation , and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) to assess overall scar appearance. This will be done at the one-week, two-month and six-month post-operative follow-ups.

The Wound Evaluation Scale (WES) score (cosmetic outcome)6 months

In this study we will use three validated scar assessment tools (the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) to assess scar width, height, color, cross-hatching and overall appearance, the Wound Evaluation Scale (WES) to rate scar stepoff, contour irregularity, scar width, edge inversion, and inflammation , and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) to assess overall scar appearance. This will be done at the one-week, two-month and six-month post-operative follow-ups.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath