Assistant Professor and the Principle Investigator
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 108
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- postoperative pain by Numeric Pain Rating Scale
研究概览
简要总结
Transversalis Fascia Plane Block (TFPB) and Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) provide superior analgesia to Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) for post-cesarean pain management. This study evaluates whether TFPB or QLB is preferable when their analgesic efficacy is nearly equal, focusing on ease of performance and execution time.
详细描述
Cesarean delivery is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide and is associated with significant postoperative pain that includes both somatic and visceral components . Effective pain management not only enhances patient comfort and satisfaction but also facilitates early mobilization and reduces maternal morbidity . Although the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is widely used as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy, its relatively short duration of action and limited ability to relieve visceral pain have prompted the search for improved alternatives .
Recent advancements in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia have introduced the Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and the Transversalis Fascia Plane Block (TFPB) as promising techniques for post-cesarean analgesia. The QLB, first described by Blanco (2007) , offers extended analgesia due to its paravertebral spread, thereby addressing both somatic and visceral pain . In contrast, TFPB targets the transversalis fascia to block the T12 and L1 nerves, effectively reducing postoperative pain following cesarean delivery . Although both QLB and TFPB have been shown to provide superior analgesia compared to TAP blocks , limited data exist regarding their comparative ease of performance and procedural efficiency.
Given that the analgesic efficacy of TFPB and QLB appears comparable, it is essential to evaluate additional factors such as the time required to perform the block and the technical ease of the procedure. These factors are particularly critical in high-volume obstetric settings, where efficiency can significantly impact clinical workflow . Therefore, this study aims to compare TFPB and QLB not only in terms of analgesic efficacy but also regarding ease of performance and execution time, to determine which technique may be preferable for post-cesarean analgesia.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
A computer-generated randomization sequence was used, and group allocations were concealed in sealed opaque envelopes, which were opened only after enrollment. Although the anesthesiologist performing the block knew the group allocation, patients and outcome assessors were blinded to minimize bias.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 40 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Pregnant women aged 20-40 years scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia .
- •American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of II
- •Body mass index (BMI) of less than 35 kg/m² .
排除标准
- •History of allergy to local anesthetics.
- •Contraindications to regional anesthesia (such as coagulopathy or infection at the injection site).
- •Severe systemic diseases (renal, hepatic, or cardiovascular dysfunction).
- •weight less than 50 kg (to avoid exceeding safe doses of local anesthetic).
- •pregnancy complications like severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, or postpartum hemorrhage.
研究组 & 干预措施
TAP Block
TAP Block: A linear high-frequency probe (6-13 MHz) was placed transversely along the midaxillary line to visualize the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles. Using an in-plane approach, a 21G SonoPlex, STIM (PAJUNK, Germany), was advanced, and after hydro-dissection with 1-2 mL saline, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine, AstraZeneca, Sweden) was injected into the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles.
干预措施: TAP Block: (Procedure)
TFP Block
TFP Block: With a linear probe, the transversalis fascia was identified between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. An in-plane technique was used to insert a 21G needle, and following confirmation of correct placement with hydro-dissection, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered bilaterally.
干预措施: TFP Block: (Procedure)
QLB:
QLB: A low-frequency curvilinear probe (2-5 MHz) was used to identify the quadratus lumborum muscle and adjacent structures. The needle was advanced in-plane until it reached the targeted region adjacent to the quadratus lumborum, where after hydro-dissection, 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected bilaterally.
干预措施: QLB: (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
postoperative pain by Numeric Pain Rating Scale
时间窗: 6 ,12 and 24 hours
The primary outcome, postoperative pain, was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) at predefined intervals: 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Pain scores were documented by trained nursing staff blinded to the intervention. Opioid administration was standardized-patients received nalbuphine in 2 mg increments as needed (NRS more than 4), with a maximum dose of 10 mg in 24 hours.Minimum score 0 (no pain) and maximum 10 (severe pain). The lower the number the more free pain and the more high scale the more pain present.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Ayman Mohamady Eldemrdash
Principal Investigator
Aswan University