MedPath

Comparison Between Injection Molded PEEK Framework and Cobalt Chromium Framework in Removable Partial Denture Regarding Retention

Not Applicable
Conditions
Mandibular Prosthesis User
Interventions
Device: cobalt chromium framework RPD
Device: peek framework RPD
Registration Number
NCT03777280
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

This study is aiming to evaluate the retentive forces in PEEK framework RPD compared to Cobalt-Chrome framework RPD during attachment/detachment cycles in mandibular kennedy class I edentulous cases

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • . kennedy class I edentulous subjects indicated for framework partial denture
Exclusion Criteria
  • Uncooperative patients and bad oral hygiene patients

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
cobalt chromium framework Removable partial denturecobalt chromium framework RPDit's the gold standard framework which has many benefits such as they are used in thin sections and are less bulky,provide high strength and stiffness,and some disadvantages include hypersensitivity,metal display and oral galvanism,
peek framework Removable partial denturepeek framework RPDpolymer-based framework has recently been introduced which is made of polyetheretherketone polymer frame combined with acrylic resin denture teeth and a conventional acrylic resin denture base.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Retentionchange from baseline retention force after one month and after three months

retention force of RPD during attachment/detachment cycles measured by digital force meter device

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Manial, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath