跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01584193
NCT01584193撤回不适用

Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Totally Implantable Venous Access Port Implementation: a Single-center Controlled Randomized Superiority Trial

University of Lausanne Hospitals2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2013年6月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
发起方
试验地点
2
主要终点
surgical procedure time

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare two different surgical techniques for implementation of totally implantable central venous access ports. Ultrasound-guided suclavian vein puncture is compared to cephalic vein dissection.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age > 18
  • Informed consent
  • Need for central venous access port implementation under local anesthesia

排除标准

  • Impaired blood clotting
  • Ongoing antiplatelet drugs therapy, except acetylsalicylic acid
  • Trauma or surgical past history on both shoulder girdles
  • Known central venous thrombosis (subclavian vein, upper vena cava)
  • Known pneumothorax
  • Septic state
  • Agranulocytosis

结局指标

主要结局

surgical procedure time

时间窗: during surgical procedure

次要结局

  • technique conversion rate and causes(during surgical procedure)
  • primary implementation success rate(during surgical procedure)
  • Pain at 30 days(30 days post-procedure)
  • Complications rate at 30 days(30 days post-procedure)
  • pain during surgical procedure(during surgical procedure)
  • pain at 5 days(5 days post-procedure)
  • overall implementation success rate(during surgical procedure)
  • Complications rate during surgical procedure(during surgical procedure)
  • Complications rate at 5 days(5 days post-procedure)

研究者

发起方
University of Lausanne Hospitals
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Nicolas DEMARTINES

Professor

University of Lausanne Hospitals

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验