Comparison of two newer generation supraglottic airway devices Baska Mask and I Gel in short duration surgeries under general anesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: I10- Essential (primary) hypertensionHealth Condition 3: E039- Hypothyroidism, unspecifiedHealth Condition 4: D509- Iron deficiency anemia, unspecifiedHealth Condition 5: E02- Subclinical iodine-deficiency hypothyroidismHealth Condition 6: E119- Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/11/059853
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Moopens Medical College
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients planned for daycare surgeries
Planned for elective non head and neck surgical intervention by general anesthesia
ASA 1 AND 2
No relevant allergies (silicon)
BMI (20 to 30 kg/metre square)
Exclusion Criteria
Emergency surgeries
Neck pathology
Previous or anticipated problems with upper airway or upper GI tract
Predicted or previousLy documented upper airway
Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To assess efficacy and safety of BASKA MASK and I GEL in terms of airway sealing pressure, peak airway pressure,number of attempts,ease of insertion,post operative complicationsTimepoint: 1 min, 3 min, 5 min,10 min,20 min, 12 hours,24 hours,36hours post device insertion
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To compare and assess time taken for insertion, ease of insertion, number of attempts <br/ ><br>2.T o compare and assess post operative complication like sore throatTimepoint: 1 min, 3 min,5 min,10 min,20 min <br/ ><br>after insertion