Evaluation of the Efficacy of Aromatherapy on the Well-being of Healthcare Professionals
- Conditions
- Healthcare Professionnals
- Registration Number
- NCT05373849
- Brief Summary
The main objective is to evaluate the efficacy of aromatherapy (inhaler sticks) on the well-being of healthcare professionals practicing in medical and surgical intensive care unit, operating room/anesthesia and emergency departments
- Detailed Description
The secondary objectives of this study are :
1. To evaluate the efficacy of aromatherapy on anxiety of healthcare professionals;
2. To evaluate the efficacy of aromatherapy on stress symptoms of healthcate professionals;
3. To assess compliance with aromatherapy.
Conduct of research:
All participants included in the study will receive the study treatment (essential oils mixtures in inhaler sticks for 2 months) and the control (no intervention for 2 months), in random order. At inclusion and at the end of each period, questionnaires of well-being, anxiety and stress will be completed.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 51
- Healthcare professional ;
- Working in a medical or surgical intensive care unit or in a operating room/anesthesia unit or in the emergency department;
- Agrees not to use any topical, oral or inhaled essential oils during the two study periods, other than those specified in the study protocol;
- Written informed consent;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman;
- Known allergies to essential oils;
- Asthma;
- Scheduled departure from the unit;
- Antidepressant treatment or anxiolytic treatment;
- Taking topical, oral or inhaled essential oils durink the week prior to inclusion.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method World Health Organization index of well-being Through study completion, 4 months The World Health Organization well-being index consists of 5 items with 6 response modalities distributed on a frequency scale from 0 to 5. A global score is obtained by adding the answers to the 5 items, then multiplying this result by 4, i.e. a global score varying from 0 to 100. 0 is the worst score possible and 100 is the best score possible.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Spielberger General Anxiety Questionnaire Through study completion, 4 months The Spielberger General Anxiety Questionnaire consists of 20 items with 4 response modalities distributed on a frequency scale from 1 to 4 (the scoring of some questions being reversed). A global score between 20 and 80 is obtained by adding the answers to the 20 items.
For women the average score is 47.13.For men the average score is 39.27. A score above these averages indicates an anxious personality. The higher the score, the greater the anxiety. For men, a score higher than 51 indicates significant anxiety that interferes with quality of life. For women, a score higher than 61 indicates significant anxiety that interferes with quality of life.Follow-up diary End of aromatherapy, 2 months Compliance collected using a follow-up diary in which the participant will enter the average daily use of the "rest" stick and the "work" stick over the past week
Perceived Stress Scale Through study completion, 4 months The Perceived Stress Scale is a 10-item scale with 5 response modalities distributed on a frequency scale from 0 to 4 (the scoring of some questions being reversed). A global score between 0 and 40 is obtained by adding the answers to the 10 items.
Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
GHRMSA
🇫🇷Mulhouse, France
GHRMSA🇫🇷Mulhouse, France