Impact of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Epinephrine Administration During Cardiac Arrest .
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary ArrestEpinephrine Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05253937
- Lead Sponsor
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
- Brief Summary
In hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major challenge imposed on almost all health care systems worldwide. Despite significant progress in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the past few years, outcomes remain relatively poor with an approximate 49 % survival rate.
Epinephrine administration remains a cornerstone in the treatment of cardiac arrest. However, the preferred route of administration remains a matter of debate within the medical community .
Various routes of administration, including intravenous, intramuscular, intraosseous and endotracheal routes have been studied.
Initially, American guidelines for the treatment of cardiac arrest recommended injection of 0.5 mg of epinephrine directly into the right ventricle through the parasternal approach, aiming to achieve higher peak intracardiac concentrations and a more central effect, however the intravenous route remained preferable due to its feasibility and safety .
To our knowledge, intra-coronary epinephrine administration for intraprocedural cardiac arrest has not been evaluated or compared with other routes of administration.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 160
- Aged above 18 years old
- Diagnosed with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
- Received dual antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid and ticagrelor), or triple therapy (oral anticoagulant, acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel)
- Event of cardiac arrest during percutaneous intervention
- cardiac arrest documented prior to being transported to cardiac catheterization laboratory.
- Patients who suffered cardiac arrest for less than 60 seconds were excluded from the study.
- Received mechanical circulatory support such as intra-aortic balloon pump, temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during hospitalization.
- Presenting with any cardiac rhythm on admission other than sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation/flutter
- Signs of infection or a history of hepatic, oncologic or allergy to contrast media and end stage renal failure
- Patients who underwent primary fibrinolysis.
- Furthermore, patients who received atropine, amiodarone, lidocaine, or any other antiarrhythmic prior to CPR
- who received targeted temperature management post CPR .
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intracoronary Epinephrine administration during cardiac arrest Epinephrin - Peripheral intravenous Epinephrine administration during cardiac arrest Epinephrin - Central intravenous Epinephrine administration during cardiac arrest Epinephrin -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation) between different routes of epinephrine administration. Up to 24 hours Return of sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation/flutter for more than 5 minutes (through ECG monitoring)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Survival to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic status (CPC score1-2) Up to 30 days Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) - a five point scale that ranges from good cerebral performance (1) to brain death (5), is often used and is commonly dichotomized into "good" (CPC 1-2) versus "poor" (CPC 3-5) outcome .
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ali Aldujeli
🇱🇹Kaunas, Lithuania