跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01703975
NCT01703975已完成不适用

The Effects of Virtual Reality Ultrasound Training in Pairs Compared to Training Alone

Rigshospitalet, Denmark2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2013年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
30
试验地点
2
主要终点
Performance test

研究概览

简要总结

Virtual Reality (VR) simulation has enabled high-quality, safe and efficient training of medical health care providers. However, training costs are considerable and may be optimized using interventions to improve learning. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of training in pairs versus training alone on an VR ultrasound simulator.

Methods: 30 medical students in their final year are randomized to either training in pairs or training alone. All participants are trained for two hours. Subsequently, all students are assessed on ultrasound performance on real patients in an ambulatory setting. Performance is assessed using a rating scale that has been validated in a previous study by two blinded assessors.

详细描述

Ultrasound is becoming increasingly used in many medical specialties. However, the quality of the ultrasound examination is highly operator dependent and sufficient training of clinicians is challenging. Virtual Reality ultrasound simulation enables training under controlled conditions and it allows trainees to make mistakes before practicing on patients. However, this type of training is expensive due to costs of simulators and clinician supervisors to provide instructions and feedback while the trainees are practicing. Training in pairs, also known as dyad training, may provide a learning advantage to trainees due to shared memory and increased confidence. Moreover, dyad training allows training twice the number of trainees on simulators, which has implications to the cost-effectiveness of VR simulation.

In this study, we examine non-inferiority of dyad training compared to the effect of traditional training based on clinician instruction using a VR ultrasound simulator.

Methods Study design. A randomized observer-blinded non-inferiority study in which training in pairs is compared to training alone on a VR simulator.

Pilot study. Two pilot studies were conducted to determine which modules to include in the training curriculum and how to provide a standardized instruction of trainees. The first pilot study included 10 OB/GYN residents and 10 OB/GYN consultants, who rated and commented each module with regards to how useful they were to pelvic ultrasound training. These ratings were used to develop a training curriculum consisting of a series of basic gynecologic training modules. The second pilot study included 6 medical students, of which half trained in pairs and the other half trained alone with clinician instructions. This enabled the research team to develop a template for the instruction that should be provided by clinician instructors in the group of participants that practiced alone.

Participants. Year-six medical students in their final rotations before entering residency enrolled in this study. The only exclusion criterion was previous ultrasound courses or extra-curricular ultrasound training. 30 participants were enrolled to ensure that at least 24 completed the transfer test.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Months 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Final year medical students

排除标准

  • Prior extra-curricular ultrasound experience.

结局指标

主要结局

Performance test

时间窗: 6 hours

The outcome measure was ultrasound examination skills on pelvic ultrasound examination of patients in an ambulatory setting. Participants were asked to perform a systematic ultrasonic transvaginal examination including measurement of endometrial thickness and estimate the volume of the right ovary. All patients were required to provide written consent to participate. A blinded OB/GYN consultant rated performance using a previously validated rating scale.Sample size calculation and statistical methods.

次要结局

  • Confidence(6 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Martin G. Tolsgaard

MD

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验