The comparison of three different techniques for the treatment of gum and bone diseases of behind teeth in the mouth
- Conditions
- Mandibular molars with Class II buccal furcation defects (Hamp et.al. 1975)
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/03/012621
- Lead Sponsor
- Manipal college of dental sciences Manipal Academy of Higher Education MAHE Mangalore
- Brief Summary
The study evaluated the treatment outcomes clinically and radiographically of bidirectionally positioned flap (BPF) technique in combination with bioactive glass to open flap debridement with bioresorbable collagen membrane in combination with bioactive glass and open flap debridement alone for the treatment of mandibular molar class II furcation defects. A total of 24 class II furcation defects in 24 patients with mean age of 50.75 were enrolled after satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Every patient signed the informed consent form. The baseline and six months postoperative treatment parameters were compared. Within the limiations , it was concluded that, appropriate case selection and treatment planning is the key to achieving the best results in the treatment of class II mandibular molar furcation defects. The BPF technique in combination with a bone graft substitute and bioresorbable membrane in combination with bone graft substitue showed better results in comparision to open flap debridement. The BPF technique in combination with a bone graft substitue may show comparable treatment outcomes with the bioresorbable membrane in combination with bone graft substitute. Future studies are required with longer followups and sample size to make further definitive conclusions in using BPF surgery in combination therapy for molar class II furcation defects.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
- 1.Patients age 20 and more irrespective of gender.
- 2.Mandibular molars with Class II buccal furcation defects (Hamp et.al.
- 1975)34 3.Vertical Clinical attachment loss of ≥4mm after initial therapy.
- 4.Adequate gingival biotype of ≥1mm.
- 1.Tobacco consumption of any type.
- 2.Immunocompromised individuals.
- 3.Patients with compromised systemic health and contraindicated for periodontal surgery.
- 4.History of previous periodontal surgery performed at the site of interest in the past 24 months.
- 5.Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
- 6.Pregnant or lactating females.
- 7.Third molars with furcation involvement.
- 8.Untreated non-vital teeth.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ii.Horizontal probing depth (HPD) Baseline and six months i.Vertical probing pocket depth (VPPD) Baseline and six months iii.Probing Clinical attachment level (PCAL) Baseline and six months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method i. Gingival Recession (GR) ii. Radiographic furcation depth (RFD)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Manipal College of dental sciences, Mangalore
🇮🇳Kannada, KARNATAKA, India
Manipal College of dental sciences, Mangalore🇮🇳Kannada, KARNATAKA, IndiaShikhaPrincipal investigator9591328506dr.shikha19@gmail.com