Comparison of Two Different Methods for Reducing Pain After Lung Surgery
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Postoperative Analgesia
- Interventions
- Procedure: Rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane blockProcedure: Rhomboid intercostal block
- Registration Number
- NCT06260137
- Lead Sponsor
- Uludag University
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical study is to compare the effectiveness of the Rhomboid Intercostal Block and Sub-Servitus plan block and the effectiveness of the Rhomboid intercostal block in patients with video-supported thoracoscopic surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:
Which of these two blocks more effectively reduces the patients' pain?
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes I, II and III for whom VATS is planned
Exclusion Criteria
- Known or suspected local anesthetic allergy
- coagulopathy
- injection site infection
- history of thoracic surgery
- serious neurological or psychiatric disorder
- severe cardiovascular disease
- liver failure
- renal failure
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane block (RISS) Rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane block - Rhomboid İntercostal Block (RIB) Rhomboid intercostal block -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative analgesia first 48 hours postoperatively Patients' VAS scores and additional analgesic needs in the first 48 hours will be evaluated. VAS (visual pain scale) corresponds to a value between 0 and 10. A value of 0 means no pain, and a value of 10 is the most severe pain.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hastane
🇹🇷Bursa, Turkey