MedPath

New Gentle Biopsy Method of Cervix Lesions Using Superficial Curettage/Protocol ID: CX-CUR

Not Applicable
Conditions
CIN
Cervical Cancer
Interventions
Procedure: conventional cervix biopsy
Registration Number
NCT01836588
Lead Sponsor
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Brief Summary

It is to investigate to what extent a gentle tissue extraction of CIN lesions of the cervix will bring the same conclusion than the conventional cervix biopsy, but with less pain and morbidity, after patients were undergoing a conisation in order to treat CIN.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
300
Inclusion Criteria
  • Women between 18 and 80
  • Karnofsky-Index of 80 and higher
  • Cytological suspicious CIN and a colposcopical impression of a major lesion (therapeutical endpoint: conisation)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Former malign disease oft he pelvic organs
  • Pregnancy
  • Serious internistic diseases
  • Drug addiction

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
gentle tissue extraction (curettage)conventional cervix biopsyObject of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure. For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.
conventional cervix biopsyconventional cervix biopsyObject of this study is the evaluation of two different methods of gaining cervical tissue in order to determine whether, and if so in what extent, a CIN is existent. The first method is a cervical biopsy, the second method is a gentle tissue saving curettage of the cervix uteri. Also is to be investigated that the latter method shows a reduction of pain and morbidity after the procedure. For this reason the pathological outcome of the two methods will be compared to the result of a conisation, which will be received by the patient to cure their cervical lesions.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
pathological comparative results and all cause mobidity1 year

The comparison of these two methods to show that the pathologic diagnostical results are alike and the morbidity is less.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Charité

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath