跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00147810
NCT00147810已完成不适用

Adult Asthma Surveillance and Intervention in a Managed Care Setting

Kaiser Permanente2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 6,948 人开始时间: 2001年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
6,948
试验地点
2
主要终点
health status

研究概览

简要总结

  1. To determine if there are gender differences in asthma prevalence, severity, treatment, and health care utilization within patient populations in Kaiser Permanente Northwest and Colorado Regions.
  2. To test the ability of an automated telephone outreach intervention to reduce health care utilization for acute asthma exacerbations and improve quality of life. The intervention used speech recognition technology to gather information about current asthma control, patterns of medication use, and recent acute health care utilization for asthma. This information allowed the intervention to provide tailored educational feedback and to flag patients deemed to be at high risk for future exacerbations so that they could be followed up by the health care system.

详细描述

  1. To determine gender differences, a questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 members with asthma in Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) and 800 in KP Colorado (KPC) Regions, which are large, group-model health maintenance organizations. Results were combined with information from administrative databases on health care utilization..
  2. The telephone intervention study was conducted within KPNW. 6,948 eligible HMO members were identified from the electronic medical record (EMR). Individuals 18 or older were eligible for the study if they were either (1) on the KPNW high risk asthma registry or (2) had at least 180 days of anti-asthma medication dispensings and at least one medical contact for asthma during a specified two-year period. Excluded were 850 individuals who had COPD listed in the electronic medical record.

Eligible individuals were randomly assigned to either usual care (n=3,367) or telephone outreach (n=3,581); 192 members of the telephone outreach group were randomly selected to receive calls from a real person, while the remaining 3,389 received automated calls.

The intervention consisted of three rounds of calling, spaced ~five months apart. Calls consisted of a brief series of questions to assess (1) recent emergency department or hospital care without a follow-up visit, (2) current level of asthma control, (3) current patterns of asthma medication use, and (4) whether the member could identify a primary provider for asthma care. (Sel-identified COPD patients received an abbreviated intervention but were kept on the call list unless a diagnosis of COPD was subsequently added in thier EMR.)

Based on the responses to these initial questions, members were offered tailored feedback regarding their overall level of asthma control and use of asthma medications. Feedback was designed to convey a positive message and not be prescriptive. The call concluded with an offer to receive information about additional Kaiser Permanente (KP) resources (a toll-free health line and KP's online website for members), followed by an offer to call again in five months.

The calls were brief and lasted less than 10 minutes. Participants could refuse the tailored feedback. To maximize participation, calls were made using speech recognition (or speech enabled) technology, rather than requiring the respondent to respond by pushing buttons.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 years or older
  • On KPNW high-risk asthma registry
  • At least 180 days of asthma medications dispensings
  • At least one visit for asthma in previous 2 years

排除标准

  • Diagnosis of COPD on problem list in electronic medical record

结局指标

主要结局

health status

current asthma control

patterns of medication use

asthma quality of life

self-management practices

attitudes about asthma

satisfaction with care

health care utilization

dispensings of anti-asthma medications

routine and acute health care utilization

次要结局

  • patient satisfaction
  • clinician satisfaction

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验