Comparison between free flaps and distant pedicled flaps for resurfacing upper limb defects
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/05/052770
- Lead Sponsor
- R Saradha
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All patients with soft tissue defects of upper limb due to trauma, burns, soft tissue tumors, infection
Exclusion Criteria
patients not fit for prolonged anaesthesia, not willing for prolonged follow up, under age of 12
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method compare distant pedicled flaps and free flaps used for upper limb reconstruction I terms of functional, aesthetic and psychosocial outcomesTimepoint: 3 months and 6 months post operatively
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to identify and compare factors associated with complications in patients undergoing distant pedicled flaps and free flaps for soft tissue defects of upper limbTimepoint: 3 months and 6 months post operatively