Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05493228
NCT05493228UnknownPhase 3

the Role of Dexmedetomidine (Precedex) Infusion on Intraoperative Propofol & Fentanyl Requirements in Spine Surgery for Pediatric Cancer Patients

Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 573571 site in 1 country38 target enrollmentStarted: May 17, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
Enrollment
38
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in MEP amplitude and latency

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this trial is to investigate whether the effect of a low-dose dexmedetomidine infusion will decrease propofol consumption or not through a double blinded randomized controlled trial done in children cancer hospital 57357.

Detailed Description

Spinal surgery with instrumentation is associated with the risk of iatrogenic injuries to the spinal cord. The combination of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and transcranial electric motor evoked potential (tcemep) monitoring has resulted in a high degree of sensitivity in predicting postoperative neurologic outcomes. Anesthetic agents have a dose-dependent adverse effect on the ability to record evoked potential responses. Many commonly used anesthetic agents produce a dose-dependent amplitude reduction and latency prolongation of evoked responses, which may impair diagnosis of intraoperative spinal cord injury. Neuroprotection is the cornerstone of anesthetic management in neurosurgery. Preserving the quality of SSEP and motor evoked potential (MEP) and minimizing the effects of anesthetic agents on neurologic monitoring are thus investigators' priorities.

Motor-evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring are universally used during spine surgeries, which poses risks to the functional integrity of descending motor and ascending sensory pathways.

MEP baseline recording is obtained at the start of surgery determining the amplitude. The alarming criteria for MEP are attenuation of more than 50 % in motor response amplitude for segmental tcMEP, more than 80 % for long tract tcMEP and/or abolishment of tcMEP data. Any significant change is immediately reported to the surgeons.

Prior to skin incision, SSEP baseline amplitude and latency of cortical potential peaks were recorded (N20 for upper SSEP and P37 for lower SSEP). The alarming criteria of SSEP are 50% decreased amplitude and/or more than 10% increased latency compared to baseline.

The anesthetic agents have effects on the latency and amplitude of MEP and SSEP monitoring which is dose-dependent. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and opioid is commonly recommended for surgeries that require MEP and SSEP monitoring. However, propofol administered with a large dose affects MEP monitoring.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

Masking Description

The PI (anesthesiologist), neurosurgeon ,patient, all assisting surgeons and anesthesiologist as well operating and circulating nurse will be blinded to the study arm to which patient belongs to. Only clinical trial unit and pharmacist will be unblinded.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
5 Years to 18 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • spinal cord tumor resection based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies.
  • age between 5 -18 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II or III.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Emergency spine surgery
  • Cardiac patients
  • Any individual with stage 4 or greater chronic kidney disease (eGFR< 30 ml/min) and/or requiring dialysis
  • liver failure defined as a history of cirrhosis or fulminant hepatic failure
  • Preoperative dexmethatodine use
  • Preoperative systolic hypertension defined by a systolic blood pressure greater than 130 mmHg in the surgical admission suite
  • Enrolled in another study within 30 days.

Arms & Interventions

patient is receiving dexmedetomidine

Experimental

dexmedetomidine infusion at the rate of 0.5 μg kg-1 hr-1, started after the induction of general anesthesia without a loading dose

Intervention: Precedex Injectable Product (Drug)

standard treatment (saline)

Placebo Comparator

saline injection only after the induction of general anesthesia

Intervention: Saline (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in MEP amplitude and latency

Time Frame: at baseline and during surgery

intraoperatively monitoring by neurophysiology in MV

Rate of propofol infusion per hour

Time Frame: during surgery

measured by infusion pump in ml/hr

Depth of anesthesia by bispectral index

Time Frame: during surgery

intraoperatively by anesthesiologist BIS within normal range 40-60

change in SSEP amplitude and latency

Time Frame: at baseline and during surgery

intraoperatively monitoring by neurophysiology in MV

Secondary Outcomes

  • to access rapid recovery in both arms(immediately after surgery)
  • to access the event of hypotension in both arms(baseline ,during surgery and immediately after surgery)
  • to access the event of bradycardia in both arms(baseline, during surgery and immediately after surgery)

Investigators

Sponsor
Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt 57357
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials