Comparison of two different methods of alveolar bone preservation following tooth extractio
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/05/025065
- Lead Sponsor
- AMRITA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All anterior and premolar teeth extraction cases in which patients who are planned to receive implants/FPD in future, non- smoker, satisfactory periodontal status
Exclusion Criteria
Uncontrolled systemic disorders, immuno- compromised patients, known allergic cases for allograft and collagen membrane, pregnant and lactating women, un co-operative patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Alveolar bone height and widthTimepoint: Baseline, 1 month and 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ot applicableTimepoint: Not applicable
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular pathways are involved in alveolar bone preservation using socket grafting versus guided bone regeneration?
How does the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma compare to synthetic bone substitutes in socket preservation trials?
Which biomarkers correlate with successful alveolar ridge maintenance after tooth extraction in clinical studies?
What are the long-term adverse events associated with alveolar socket preservation techniques in periodontal surgery?
How do stem cell-based therapies influence bone regeneration outcomes in CTRI/2020/05/025065 Amrita School of Dentistry trial?