MedPath

Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Difficult Airway Situations

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Airway Morbidity
Emergencies
Interventions
Device: Combitube, Easytube, Laryngeal masks
Registration Number
NCT02572232
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare three supraglottic airway devices (Combitube, Easytube, laryngeal mask airway) to endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway scenario in a pediatric manikin.

Detailed Description

Supraglottic airway devices (SAD) have been designed for the "cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" scenario in prehospital as well as intrahospital settings and are utilized in medical emergency services and emergency departments all over the world, not only for anticipated and unanticipated difficult airway situations but also as an airway device used by non-anesthesiologists or in situations where only limited practice is possible. Securing an airway in a pediatric emergency situation is crucial. Unfortunately, pediatricians usually lack the required skills and regular practice to perform endotracheal intubation (ETI, which is the gold standard for securing an airway) quickly and safely. SADs would pose a safe and feasible alternative to ETI. However, no studies on this topic are available. The investigators therefore wanted to evaluate three different SADs (Combitube, Easytube, laryngeal mask airway) in simulated difficult airway situations in a pediatric manikin in comparison to ETI.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • pediatricians
  • residents
  • interns
  • written informed consent form
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • none
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Combitube, Easytube, Laryngeal masksCombitube, Easytube, Laryngeal masksCombitube, Easytube, Laryngeal mask airway are intubated in pediatric airway manikins by probands in randomized order.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to successful ventilation1 min
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Success rate1 min
Re-assessment of success rate after 3 months3 months
Rating of the device (questionnaire)1 min

questionnaire, ratings from 1 (best) to 5 (worst)

Re-assessment of time to successful ventilation after 3 months3 months
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath