Comparison of Neurolytic Block Techniques for the Treatment of Abdominal Visceral Pain and Their Influence On The Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 64
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- PAIN SCORE
研究概览
简要总结
The neurolytic blocks of sympathetic chains are commonly used for the treatment of cancer-related pain. This study aims to compare celiac plexus neurolysis and splanchnic nerve neurolysis for the treatment of abdominal visceral pain and its influence on the quality of life of patients with cancer.
详细描述
Double-blind randomized clinical trial.
The objective of the study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of splanchnic nerve neurolysis with alcohol to celiac plexus block with alcohol, with pain relief as the primary outcome. It also aims to quantify the adverse effects of the techniques as secondary outcomes. The sample size calculation will be based on comparing the mean pain scores on the Numerical Rating Scale of patients in the Control Group and the Intervention Group, evaluated after completing the second month of treatment. A two-tailed t-test will be sufficient and will require an adequate sample size. Therefore, for the chosen sample design with a significance level of α=5%, a power of 1-β=80%, assuming M1=5.0 and M2=3.5 and a standard deviation of 2.0, the sample size required is n=58. the sample size required is n=58. Considering a 10% dropout rate, the final sample size will be increased to 64 participants. Convenience sampling (a non-probabilistic sampling method) will be used. Participants will be randomly allocated to the groups using a list generated by a program obtained at https://www.randomizer.org. The proportion between the participants in the groups will be 1:1, with 32 patients allocated to the Intervention arm and 32 to the Control arm. The allocation of the total 64 participants will be determined by randomly assigned sequential letters (A or B) generated by the computer (website https://www.randomizer.org), randomly assigning numbers from 0 to 64 to each group: Control Group (Celiac Block) and Intervention Group (Splanchnic Nerve Block). The Control Group will receive celiac plexus neurolysis with absolute alcohol, and the Intervention Group will receive splanchnic nerve neurolysis with alcohol. The statistical analysis will be performed in program R version 3.5.1. The results obtained will be presented as mean + standard deviation for continuous data or absolute frequency for described data. For quantitative variables, the Student's t-test will be used for normally distributed data, or the Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed data. For qualitative variables, the chi-square test will be used or Fisher's exact test. Significant difference is defined as p < 0.05. Data will be collected and managed using REDCap data capture tools.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients aged 18 years or older Presence of localized visceral pain in the upper abdomen originating from cancer of the stomach, duodenum, distal esophagus, ascending or transverse colon, liver, biliary tract, or pancreas
- •Ineffectiveness of analgesic treatment with third-step opioids according to the WHO analgesic ladder, including:
- •Opioids (≥ 60 mg/day of morphine equivalents) Antidepressants (tricyclic or dual-action), at any dosage Gabapentinoids, at any dosage Presence of side effects from analgesics that are difficult to manage with medication
排除标准
- •Presence of ascites Presence of deep vein thrombosis Presence of hepatic failure: Child-Pugh class B or C Presence of renal failure: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² Use of any anticoagulant medication
- •Clinical coagulation disorder, defined as:
- •INR > 1.5 Prothrombin activity < 70% or prothrombin time > 13.5 seconds aPTT > 40 seconds Cardiovascular failure: NYHA class III
结局指标
主要结局
PAIN SCORE
时间窗: 1st Day Post-procedure; 15th Day Post-procedure; 30th Day Post-procedure; 2nd Month Post-procedure
Pain will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), a scale from 0 to 10 where: 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. Scores are typically categorized as: Mild pain: 0-3 Moderate pain: 4-6 Severe pain: 7-10 Additionally, the Descriptive Verbal Scale will be used, with the following categories: No pain Mild pain Moderate pain Severe pain.
次要结局
- Quality of life assessment.(1st Day Post-procedure; 15th Day Post-procedure; 30th Day Post-procedure; 2nd Month Post-procedure)
- Adverse Events(1st Day Post-procedure; 15th Day Post-procedure; 30th Day Post-procedure; 2nd Month Post-procedure)
研究者
amsousa
Coordinator of the Pain Group at the Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo.
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
