MedPath

Carbon PEEK Versus Titanium Pedicle Screws in the Treatment of Spinal Tumors

Not Applicable
Withdrawn
Conditions
Spinal Tumor
Interventions
Procedure: surgical stabilization of the spine due to primary and secondary spinal tumors
Registration Number
NCT03893110
Lead Sponsor
Balgrist University Hospital
Brief Summary

Radiation therapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of spinal neoplasms as radical resections are often limited anatomically. Frequently, a surgical stabilization with implants is required. However, metallic implants not only make the CT-based planning of a subsequent radiation therapy more difficult, but might also have an uncontrolled dose modulating effect in adjuvant radiotherapy. At the spine, radiation is limited by the effective dose posed to the relatively radiosensitive spinal cord. While metallic implants might result in an inhomogeneous and uncontrollable dose distribution due to the interface effect, the use of new radiolucent implants consisting of carbon/polyether ether ketone (PEEK) might allow a more homogeneous and predictable dose distribution. This study aims to evaluate the potential benefits of the use of carbon/PEEK pedicle screws during adjuvant radiation therapy and follow-up imaging of spinal tumors.

60 patients will randomized 1:1 into either treatment arm (Pedicle System Carbon/PEEK vs. Pedicle System Titanium). The feasibility of planning the radiation therapy will be evaluated. The postoperatively administered total radiation dose is documented. The radiological visualization of the area of interest will be evaluated The surgical outcome is evaluated by fusion rate, implant integrity and anchorage. Patients will be followed up for 12 months according to local standards.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients 18 to 99 years of Age
  • Primary and secondary spinal tumors of the thoracolumbar spine requiring posterior instrumentation and radiation therapy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Need of cement augmentation or anterior cage support (corpectomy)
  • Patients with contraindication against surgical resection
  • Patients with incomplete medical records or insufficient imaging

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Instrumentation with Carbon/PEEK pedicle screw systemsurgical stabilization of the spine due to primary and secondary spinal tumorsPosterior instrumentation using a Carbon/PEEK pedicle screw system two levels above and below the affected segment(s). The medical device is a commercial product, bears a conformity marking and is used in accordance with the instructions.
Instrumentation with titanium pedicle screw systemsurgical stabilization of the spine due to primary and secondary spinal tumorsPosterior instrumentation using a titanium pedicle screw system two levels above and below the affected segment(s). The medical device is a commercial product, bears a conformity marking and is used in accordance with the instructions.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
feasibility of planning the radiation therapybefore radiation therapy

evaluated by a subjective score (0-10) stated by an independent radiooncologist using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10

radiation dosewithin 6 weeks of radiation therapy

The total radiation dose administered is measured in Gray

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
radiological visualization of the area of interestduring radiation therapy

evaluated by a subjective score stated by an independent radiologist using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 10

time to recurrenceup to 1 year

monitoring of recurrence using radiological imaging is performed routinely according to clinical standards

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital Balgrist

🇨🇭

Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath