MedPath

Comparison of remimazolam and propofol anesthesia for interventional neuroradiology

Not Applicable
Conditions
IV general anesthesia for interventional neuroradiology
Registration Number
JPRN-UMIN000047384
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Brief Summary

The total phenylephrine dose was lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group (p??=??0.001). Hypotensive events were observed in 11 patients in the remimazolam group and 23 patients in the propofol group (p??=??0.001). Recovery times to spontaneous breathing, eye-opening, extubation, and orientation were shorter in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group (all p??<??0.001).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Complete: follow-up complete
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
76
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

- A ruptured aneurysm - Multiple aneurysms - History of neuromuscular/cognitive/psychiatric disease (on medication) - Preexisting renal or hepatic dysfunction - Glaucoma

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
- Total phenylephrine dose required to restore blood pressure during hypotensive events during the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
- The number of hypotension events - Intraoperative remifentanil dose - Time from the end of hemostatic compression to return of spontaneous breathing, time to eye opening, time to extubation, and time to orientation recovery - Time from the end of hemostatic compression to BIS 75, time from flumazenil injection to extubation, time from flumazenil injection to return of orientation (only in remimazolam group) - Intraoperative vital signs
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath