Comparison between two intubating devices vLarynx Video Laryngoscope and Airtraq optical laryngoscope.
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/08/035847
- Lead Sponsor
- Department Of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care JNMCH AM
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA grade 1 and 2
Age between 20 and 60 years
Weight between 41 and 80 kg
Gender - male and female
Patients planned for elective surgeries
Exclusion Criteria
Cervical spine injury
Head and Neck Surgery
Valvular Heart Disease
CAD / uncontrolled hypertension
Presence of raised intracranial pressure
Mouth opening less than 2.5 cm
Any pathology of oral cavity that will obstruct the insertion of device
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the number of attempts and time taken using the two devices for intubation.Timepoint: 8 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to compare the glottic view using POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score <br/ ><br>Ease of tracheal intubation using these devices <br/ ><br>to compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation. <br/ ><br>to compare hemodynamic response after laryngoscopy and intubation. <br/ ><br>to look for post operative complications if any. <br/ ><br>to compare success of laryngoscopy and intubation in all classes of Mallampati grading.Timepoint: 8 months