MedPath

Comparison of hyperbaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in anorectal and urological surgeries

Phase 3
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Phimosis, (2) ICD-10 Condition: N359||Urethral stricture, unspecified, (3) ICD-10 Condition: N20-N23||Urolithiasis,
Registration Number
CTRI/2023/05/052486
Lead Sponsor
Sneha T
Brief Summary

To compare durationof motor blockade of hyperbaric bupivacaine andhyperbaric ropivacaine is the primary objective.

Drug having faster regression of the block, adequate for the scheduled surgery and also which  has a higher patient satisfaction can be recognised.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • 1.Patients scheduled to undergo elective anorectal and urological surgeries under spinal anaesthesia 2.Patients of ASA physical status I & II.
  • 3.Patients of either sex.
  • 4.Age >18 years or < 60 years.
Exclusion Criteria
  • 1.Patients of ASA physical status III and IV 2.Patients with local site infection, allergy to the drugs used 3.Patients who have psychiatric illness, coagulation abnormalities 4.Pregnant / Lactating women.
  • 5.Patients refusal.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1) duration of motor blockade1) time from intrathecal injection to modified bromage score 0
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1) onset and duration of sensory block2) pain assessment

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

sri manakula vinayagar medical college and hospital

🇮🇳

Pondicherry, PONDICHERRY, India

sri manakula vinayagar medical college and hospital
🇮🇳Pondicherry, PONDICHERRY, India
Sneha T
Principal investigator
9047015196
snehathandapani@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.