MedPath

Effects of Occlusal Imbalance and Clenching on Balance in Stroke Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Stroke
Registration Number
NCT07007429
Lead Sponsor
Bitlis Eren University
Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of stimulated occlusal imbalance and jaw clenching on balance and fall risk in patients with stroke.

Detailed Description

This randomized controlled study will be conducted on a minimum of 42 stroke patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients included in the study will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: the ipsilateral side stimulated occlusal imbalance group, the contralateral side stimulated occlusal imbalance group, or the bilateral jaw clenching group.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Having chronic stroke,
  • A Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 or higher,
  • Being between 18 and 75 years of age,
  • Having a Brunnstrom stage of 4 or above,
  • Ability to stand independently for 20 seconds or more,
  • Ability to walk independently for 10 meters, using assistive devices or orthoses if necessary,
  • Having opposing mandibular and maxillary second premolars or first molars
Exclusion Criteria
  • The presence of severe osteoarthritis in the lower extremity,
  • The presence of cancer or diabetic neuropathy,
  • The presence of vestibular disorder,
  • The presence of lower extremity ulceration or amputation,
  • Hemodynamic instability,
  • The presence of other neurological disorders (such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease),
  • Having experienced an acute lower extremity injury in the last six weeks,
  • History of lower extremity surgery,
  • Alcohol consumption in the last 24 hours
  • Posterior circulation stroke involving the basilar artery or cerebellum

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Postural Stability Index MeasurementChange from baseline overall postural stability index immediately after the intervention

This index will be assessed by measuring deviations of the center of gravity in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions. Lower scores indicate smaller deviations and better postural stability. The test will be performed on a stable platform with two trials of 30 seconds each. The average of the two trials will be automatically calculated by the TechnoBody balance system.

Fall Risk AssessmentChange from baseline fall risk immediately after the intervention

Fall risk will be assessed by measuring the patient's ability to maintain balance on an unstable platform. Based on their ability to maintain balance, a fall risk score will be generated, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of falling. The test will be performed with two 30-second trials. The average of the two trials will be calculated automatically by the TechnoBody balance system.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Anteroposterior Stability Index MeasurementChange from baseline anteroposterior stability index immediately after the intervention

The anteroposterior stability index will be assessed by measuring deviations of the center of gravity in the anteroposterior direction. Lower scores indicate smaller deviations and better anteroposterior postural stability. The test will be performed on a stable platform with two trials of 30 seconds each. The average of the two trials will be automatically calculated by the TechnoBody balance system.

Mediolateral Stability Index MeasurementChange from baseline mediolateral stability index immediately after the intervention

The mediolateral stability index will be assessed by measuring deviations of the center of gravity in the mediolateral direction. Lower scores indicate smaller deviations and better mediolateral postural stability. The test will be performed on a stable platform with two trials of 30 seconds each. The average of the two trials will be automatically calculated by the TechnoBody balance system.

Weight Bearing Distribution AssessmentChange from baseline weight bearing distribution immediately after the intervention

Weight-bearing distribution will be assessed by measuring the percentage of body weight borne by each limb during quiet standing. Lower asymmetry values indicate more balanced weight distribution and better postural stability. The test will be performed on a stable platform with two trials of 30 seconds each. The average of the two trials will be automatically calculated by the TechnoBody balance system.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bolu İzzet Baysal Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

🇹🇷

Bolu, Merkez, Turkey

Bolu İzzet Baysal Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
🇹🇷Bolu, Merkez, Turkey
burak mavuş, M.Sc.
Contact
5388178351
a.burakmavus@gmail.com
birkan özkardaş, Mr.
Contact
5550639585
brknzkrds31@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.