COMPARISON OF DE-EPITHELIALIZED GINGIVAL GRAFT OR DE-EPITHELIALIZED GINGIVAL UNIT GRAFT WITH TUNNELED CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF RT2 GINGIVAL RECESSION – A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
试验速览
- 阶段
- Phase 3 4
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 18
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- to asses Recession Width, Recession Depth,Volumetric change assessment,probing depth.
研究概览
简要总结
Gingival unit graft (GUG) is a modified FGG which includes the marginal and papillary gingiva. Findings consistently indicate that GUG offers superior outcomes in terms of recession coverage, keratinized tissue gain, and aesthetic outcomes compared to FGG. This is attributed to the rich vascular plexus and anastomoses which perfuse marginal and papillary gingiva. The severed blood vessels of recipient site anastomose rapidly with the rich plexus leading to superior clinical results [3]. Based on these findings it was hypothesized that de-epithelialized GUG could provide comparable results along with TCAF (Tunneled coronally advanced flap) for RT2 recession. However, no studies have specifically investigated the application of de-epithelialized GUG with TCAF in treating RT2 defects.
Therefore, the purpose of the research is to compare clinically, the effectiveness of de-epithelialized Free gingival graft (FGG) to de-epithelialized gingival unit grafts (GUG) in combination with TCAF for management of RT2 gingival recession.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 45.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Recession type 2 (RT2)including incisors and premolars.
- •Individuals between the age group of 18-45, both male and female 3)Individuals who are systemically healthy.
- •Subjects whose Plaque index (PI) score is less than 1.9.
排除标准
- •1.Patients who are smokers ( more than 10 cigarettes/day).
- •2.Patients who are not available for follow up.
- •3.Pregnant and Lactating mothers.
结局指标
主要结局
to asses Recession Width, Recession Depth,Volumetric change assessment,probing depth.
时间窗: baseline and after 4 months of surgery
次要结局
- to asses probing depth,clinical attachment loss,complete root coverage in percentage,root coverage esthetic score.(both at baseline and after 4 months of surgery.)
研究者
Hiral Karwa
bapuji dental college and hospital