Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis of Intravenous Esomeprazole in Chinese Seriously Ill Patients
- Registration Number
- NCT02157376
- Lead Sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Brief Summary
The efficacy of esomeprazole will be compared versus cimetidine (a drug that previously demonstrated prevention of bleeding events) during treatment period in proportion of patients for the prevention of upper GI bleeding.
- Detailed Description
Stress related upper Gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings are important events associated with morbidity and mortality among seriously ill patients. Data from the literature suggest that stress ulcer prevention with effective acid suppressive treatment can reduce bleeding events and is thus an important therapy in high-risk patients. Esomeprazole has the potential to reduce gastric acidity for prolonged periods of time adequate for both preventing mucosal damage and facilitating coagulation. This study is to reveal whether intravenous (iv) esomeprazole is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding and if it is tolerated by Chinese seriously ill patients.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 343
- Critically ill patients
- Requirement for mechanical ventilation
- At least one major risk factor for stress ulcer related bleeding
- History of gastric or oesophageal surgery
- Evidence of active GI bleeding
- Advanced renal disease
- Treatment with any Proton Pump Inhibitors
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Esomeprazole active treatment Esomeprazole iv esomeprazole 30 min intermittent infusions given for maximum 14 days Cimetidine active treatment Cimetidine iv cimetidine 30 min bolus infusion followed by iv cimetidine continuous infusion given for maximum 14 days
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The Percent of Patients With Clinically Significant Upper-GI Bleeding During the Treatment Evaluation Phase 1-14 days Criteria for a clinically significant upper GI bleeding as:
1. Bright red blood per NG or OG tube that did not clear after NG or OG tube adjustment and 5 to 10 minutes of at least 100 ml lavage with room temperature normal saline-or,
2. Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material
During IMP treatment Day 1-2:
Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material for at least eight consecutive hours that did not clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline.
During IMP treatment Day 3-14:
Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material in at least three consecutive gastric aspirates within 2 to 4 hours (at least 60 ±20 minutes apart), that did not clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Proportion of Patients With Any Overt Upper-GI Bleeding (Significant and Non-significant) During the Treatment Evaluation Phase 1-14 days Criteria for a significant upper GI bleeding as described in primary outcome measure or,
Criteria for a non-significant upper GI bleeding as:
1. Bright red blood per NG or OG tube that clear after NG or OG tube adjustment and 5 to 10 minutes of lavage with room temperature normal saline or,
2. Persistent gastroccult- positive coffee ground material
During IMP treatment Day 1-2:
Persistent gastroccult - positive coffee ground material for at less than eight consecutive hours or that clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline.
During IMP treatment Day 3-14:
Persistent gastroccult - positive coffee ground material in less than three consecutive gastric aspirates within 2 to 4 hours (at least 60±20 minutes apart), or that clear with at least 100 ml of lavage with room temperature normal saline or,
3. Any clinical signs of hematemesis or melena or haematochezia judged (by the Investigator) to be from an upper GI source.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Research Site
🇨🇳Zhanjiang, China