Comparative evaluation of the survival rate and gingival health of 3D printed band and loop space maintainer with conventional band and loop space maintainer in childre
Phase 1
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K006- Disturbances in tooth eruption
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/11/029271
- Lead Sponsor
- nil
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients in the age group of 4 to 9 years.
Extraction sites or teeth indicated for extraction with no space loss.
Erupting permanent teeth having adequate bone covering.
Fully erupted carious free teeth, will be included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
Patients not in the age group of 4 to 9 years.
teeth not indicated for extraction.
extraction sites with space loss.
permanent teeth having non adequate bone covering.
partially erupted carious teeth
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 3D printed band and loop space maintainer will have a better survival rate and gingival health compared to conventional band and loop space maintainer in children <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 9 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method There is no significant difference between survival rate and gingival health of 3D printed vs. conventional band and loop space maintainers in childrenTimepoint: 9 months