MedPath

"Re-instrumentation vs Flap Surgery"

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Periodontitis
Periodontal Pocket
Registration Number
NCT05460988
Lead Sponsor
University of Florence
Brief Summary

There are no studies comparing reinstrumentation and flap surgery for the treatment of residual periodontal pockets.

The aim of this RCT is to compare the re-instrumentation vs the flap surgery in terms of PD reduction, CAL gain, gingival recession, need of an additional surgery and pocket closure. Moreover, PROMs will be evaluated

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
46
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥18aa
  • Patients with periodontal disease
  • Less than 20 cigarettes/day
  • No systemic antibiotic therapy in the last 3 months
  • At least one interdental site showing PD≥5mm after the non surgical periodontal initial therapy. Infrabony component of the defect ≤3mm at x-ray
  • Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score <15% at baseline (re-evaluation) measured at six sites per tooth
  • No previous periodontal surgery at the experimental tooth
Exclusion Criteria
  • Connective tissue diseases
  • Diabetes
  • Pregnancy or lactating
  • Furcation involvement
  • Crowned tooth
  • Severe tooth mobility (class III)
  • Radiographical horizontal bone resorption exceeding the 50% of the root

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
PD change12 months after the procedure

change in periodontal probing depth (in mm)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
CAL change12 months after the procedure

change in clinical attachment level (in mm)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Florence

🇮🇹

Florence, Italy

University of Florence
🇮🇹Florence, Italy

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.