Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04323540
NCT04323540
Unknown
N/A

Surgical Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-Implantitis With or Without Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy0 sites32 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2020

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Peri-Implantitis
Sponsor
George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy
Enrollment
32
Primary Endpoint
Clinical attachment level
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects. More specifically, the control group will be a reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). The test group will be the same with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to grafting materials.

Outcomes will include CAL, PD, MR, defect resolution, PI, BoP, SUPP, patient-reported outcome measures including an aesthetic self-evaluation.

Detailed Description

The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects. More specifically, the control group will be a "pure" reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and reservable collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). This is in accordance with gold standard practices of reconstructive therapy of peri-implant defects. The test group will be treated with the same approach and materials, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to the grafting materials. The graft will be harvested from the homolateral palate (molar region). Outcomes will include CAL, clinical attachment level (primary outcome), PD or probing depth, MR or mucosal recession, defect resolution (composite outcome made up of simultaneous absence of PD\>5 mm, BOP/SUP and bone level changes \>0.5 mm, PI, BoP or bleeding upon probing, suppuration SUP on probing, SUP on palpation, patient-reported outcome measures including an aesthetic self-evaluation. The measures will be recorded at baseline, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24 months. Radiographic bone levels will be compared with 2 week image at 12 and 24 months

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 1, 2020
End Date
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Lucrezia Paternò Holtzman

Investigator

George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • · Be able and willing to provide consent and sign the informed consent form.
  • Be able and willing to comply with study procedures and follow-up appointments required by the study protocol.
  • Age\>18 years
  • Presence of at least one implant affected with peri-implantitis, defined as the following con-dition: at least one site presenting peri-implant probing depth (PPD) \>6 mm and simultane-ous presence of profuse BoP/SUP and a radiographically documented change in bone level greater than initial bone remodeling. In the likely event that a baseline radiographic image is absent, the bone level will be compared to where it would likely have been at the time of implant insertion and a difference of \>3 mm from that level will be considered.
  • Implants in function (i.e. loaded) for at least 1 year.
  • Screw- and cement-retained suprastructures for both fixed and removable prostheses.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Compromised systemic health which contraindicates the study procedures.
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
  • Cigarette smoking\>5 per day
  • Systemic conditions compromising healing (i.e. diabetes mellitus). Patients with diabe-tes mellitus types I or II will be asked to provide information regarding their most re-cent HbA1c values. Only patients with HbA1c\<7% will be enrolled.
  • Patients taking medications known to interfere with gingival or bone metabolism.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical attachment level

Time Frame: change from baseline to: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the bottom of the pocket

Secondary Outcomes

  • Gingival thickness(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • Probing depth(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • profuse bleeding(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • Disease resolution(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • plaque index (minimum value 0, maximum 1)(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • BOP(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • Patient-reported outcome measures(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • Mucosal recession(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • suppuration(6, 12, 18, 24 months)
  • Radiographic bone levels(2 weeks, 12 months, 24 months)

Similar Trials