Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/NCT04815655
NCT04815655UnknownNot Applicable

Cartilage Tympanoplasty for Recurrent Perforation Full Thickness Versus Partial Thickness Graft

Assiut University0 sites30 target enrollmentStarted: April 1, 2021Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
30
Primary Endpoint
To compare between outcomes of full thickness versus partial thickness graft in cartilage tympanoplasty using cartilage slicer
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaOutcomesInvestigatorsRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Cartilage tympanoplasty for recurrent perforation full thickness versus partial thickness graft.

Detailed Description

To compare between outcomes of full thickness versus partial thickness graft in cartilage tympanoplasty using cartilage slicer

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Care Provider)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1 -patients with safe chronic suppurative otitis media 2- patients with recurrent perforations 3- patients with conductive hearing loss- 4- patients above 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • •active infection
  • •sensorineural hearing loss
  • •compromised immune system 4 - patients age below 18 years

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare between outcomes of full thickness versus partial thickness graft in cartilage tympanoplasty using cartilage slicer

Time Frame: 1 year

To compare between outcomes of full thickness versus partial thickness graft in cartilage tympanoplasty using cartilage slicer

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Caroleen Mounir Tawfik

principle investigator

Assiut University

Similar Trials

Unknown
Not Applicable
Cartilage Versus Temporalis Fascia Graft in Tympanoplasty for Recurrent Tympanic Membrane Perforation '' Comparative Study ''Tympanic Membrane Perforation
NCT05282810Assiut University26
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Microscopic Versus Endoscopic TympanoplastyTympanic Membrane Perforation
NCT06257602Assiut University80
Completed
Not Applicable
Platelet Rich Fibrin Augmented Tympanoplasty Versus Cartilage TympanoplastyChronic Suppurative Otitis Media
NCT05967845Mansoura University156
Unknown
Not Applicable
Repair of Tympanic Membrane Perforation Using Tachosil Under Local AnesthesiaTympanic Membrane Perforation
NCT04428463HaEmek Medical Center, Israel27
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Trans Canal Tympanoplasty With Local Anesthesia Using Fat Graft and "TachoSil"Tympanic Membrane Perforation
NCT06542367HaEmek Medical Center, Israel20