MedPath

Cognitive Training for Diabetes Self-Management

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Registration Number
NCT04831775
Lead Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Brief Summary

The overall objective of this study is to determine the effects of a comprehensive cognitive rehabilitation intervention on biological, cognitive, and diabetes self-management outcomes.

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Test the efficacy of the MAPSS-DM intervention for improving cognitive function, A1C, and DM-SM. Based on preliminary data, the working hypothesis is that compared with the control group, persons who receive the intervention will have improved memory, executive function, and perceived cognitive function, greater use of cognitive strategies, and improved DM-SM immediately post-intervention and at three and six-months post-intervention.

Aim 2: To explore changes in glycemic variability and their association with changes in cognitive function. The working hypothesis here is that MAPSS-DM participants will exhibit less glycemic variability post-intervention as compared with baseline and glycemic variability will mediate improvements in cognitive test performance.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
95
Inclusion Criteria
  • age 50 years old or greater
  • T2DM diagnosis for 2 years
  • access to phone and Internet
  • Score of ≥10 on the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ)
  • A1C of >7%.
Exclusion Criteria
  • a diagnosis of dementia/head injury
  • score of >5 on the Mini-Cog
  • inability to speak English, and T1DM diagnosis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in A1C at Week 22Baseline and week 22

Measure of difference in average glucose over 22 weeks; A1C is one time point that measures a 3 month average glucose (e.g. and A1C of 7% = approximately a 154mg/dl average glucose for the past 3 months) therefore it can be measured at baseline and week 22 and still reflect a 3 month average at both those time points.

Change in Diabetes Self-management Adherence at Week 22Baseline and week 22

Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities: 8 items; Brief assessment of diabetes related psychosocial self-efficacy. Responses are made on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) to items such as "I believe that I am able to turn my diabetes goals into a workable plan." Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-management adherence.

Change in Glucose Variability at Week 22Baseline and week 22

Difference in the standard deviation of glucose readings from baseline and week 22

Change From Baseline to Week 22 in the Number of Correct Responses in 90 Seconds on the Symbol Digit Modalities TestBaseline and week 22

Symbol Digit Modalities Test: Participants are given a series of symbols and digits and instructed to verbalize the digit associated with each symbol. The number of correct responses in 90 sec constitutes the score, and higher scores reflect better cognitive function.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Perceived Cognitive Function at Week 22Baseline and week 22

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) v2.0 - Cognitive Function: 32 items; assess patient-perceived cognitive deficits including the areas of mental acuity, concentration, verbal and nonverbal memory, and verbal fluency. Items include questions such as, "In the past 7 days, my thinking has been slow" and "In the past 7 days I have had trouble concentrating." Items are ranked on a 1 to 5 scale (5 = very often/several times a day to 1 = never). Scores range from 32 to 160. Higher scores indicate more perceived difficulty with cognitive function.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The University of Texas at Austin

🇺🇸

Austin, Texas, United States

The University of Texas at Austin
🇺🇸Austin, Texas, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.