跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04092192
NCT04092192招募中不适用

Prospective Comparison of Rigid Forceps Versus Endovascular Snare for Routine IVC Filter Retrieval

University of Chicago1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2018年12月26日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Procedure related complications

研究概览

简要总结

IVC filters are mechanical filters placed in a patient's body to trap blood clots in the legs migrating to the lungs. When no longer indicated, interventional radiologists are consulted for IVC filter removal. Currently, many methods for extracting IVC filters exist. Two of the most common methods involve using an endovascular snare device or rigid forceps. We intend to prospectively compare these two methods in an attempt to see if one offers an advantage to the other. This will be compared by evaluating success rates and procedure time.

详细描述

Currently the optimal method for IVC filter retrieval with respect to success rate and fluoroscopic time (i.e. radiation exposure) is poorly understood. Both snare and forcep techniques have independently evaluated in literature but have never been compared directly. The proposed study would prospectively assess whether one of these established technique offers an advantage with respect to either of these variables.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

盲法说明

No masking

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Non-pregnant females
  • Adult patients (age 18 years and older)
  • Referred to Interventional Radiology for IVC filter removal
  • IVC filter implanted less than 6 months with the procedure being performed at UCMC by current IR staff.
  • Cook Celect filter or Argon Medical Option Elite

排除标准

  • Patients with outside hospital filter placement
  • Filters other than Cook Celect or Argon Medical Option Elite
  • Implantation period >6 months
  • Evidence of coagulopathy (INR <1.8, platelet count >50k)
  • Clotting disorder
  • Central venous occlusion
  • Prior filter placement/removal.

研究组 & 干预措施

Forceps

Active Comparator

Subjects randomized to this cohort will have their IVC filter removed using a rigid forceps device that will be used to engage the filter apex directly and allow for the filter to be capture/removed.

干预措施: IVC filter removal (Device)

Snare

Active Comparator

Subjects randomized to this cohort will have their IVC filter removed using an endovascular snare (like a lasso) device that is designed to catch the hook of the filter and allow it to be captured.

干预措施: IVC filter removal (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Procedure related complications

时间窗: Date of procedure through 6 months following IVC filter removal

After hemostasis is achieved, patients will be monitored for 2-4 hours in the interventional radiology recovery area. One month after filter retrieval, patients will be seen in clinic for follow-up. During this visit, a physicial assessment will done, including adverse events and review of medications. Six months after filter retrieval, patient will be contacted by telephone for follow-up. Adverse event and medication review will be performed during this call.

Flouroscopy time

时间窗: Procedure start to finish

Venography will be performed using a flush catheter and contrast material to evaluate for tip embedding. After filter retrieval, repeat venography will be performed to evaluate for thrombosis, caval spasm, caval perforation, fractured fragments, and other potential complications.

Removal success rate

时间窗: Procedure date

Data will be analyzed by a biostatistician to determine statistical differences between cohorts with respect to outcome measures.

Costs

时间窗: Date of procedure up through 6 months following IVC filter removal

Costs associated with filter removal encounter

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验