Safe Landing Strategy in Older Adults
- Conditions
- Fall InjuryFall PreventionFall Safety
- Interventions
- Other: Fall ExposureOther: Tuck and Roll Group
- Registration Number
- NCT03540082
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Brief Summary
The purposes of this project to examine whether older adults can learn safe landing strategy during a fall. The research hypotheses are three-fold: 1) To determine whether older adults can learn a safe landing strategy to reduce impact severity of falling; 2) To examine whether the training effect on the right side falls can be transferred to the left side falls; and 3) To examine 1-week and 3-month retention effect of fall strategy training in older adults.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- BMI 18.5-30 kg/m2
- Healthy bone mass (2.5 SD of young)
- No tumbling experience
- > 70 years old
- Bone fracture within 3 years
- Osteoporosis
- Blood thinners
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Fall Exposure Fall Exposure An instructor will implicitly be exposed to the falling technique. Each group will have 4 sessions to physically practice the skills with each practice session lasting about an hour. Tuck and Roll Group Tuck and Roll Group An instructor will explicitly verbally and visually demonstrate the falling technique and provide feedback on participant performance. Each group will have 4 sessions to physically practice the skills with each practice session lasting about an hour.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Safe Landing Strategy 1-week and 3-months post To determine whether older adults can learn a safe landing strategy to reduce impact severity of falling through a composite outcome from the following measures:
1. Forceplate measurements (CueFors2, Motek Medical)
2. Motion capture (VICON, Oxford Metrics)
3. Inertial sensor (BioStampRC, MC10)
4. Short-term skill acquisition (Aim 1) will be quantified as change in hip impact force between baseline and post assessments on visit 4
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Retention effects 3-months post Examine retention effect of fall strategy training through a composite score from the following:
1. Participant questionnaire
2. Track and review which participants attend all four study visits