Development and Applications of Daily-use Fall Risk Assessment Device to Prevent Elderly People From Falling
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Enrollment
- 1,300
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Precision assessment of falling risk prediction
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This research attempts to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) enabled device for measuring the dynamic balance ability of older people with a sensor using an optical principle called Frustrated Total Internal Reflection. The AI-based algorithm embedded in the device performs the data analysis for balance ability assessment and falling risk prediction. As a critical part of the research, a large-scale user study is needed to test the validity of the device regarding the dynamic balance ability assessment and the accuracy of the falling risk prediction provided by the device. Also, we plan to study the factors influencing user engagement in this device through the questionnaire-based survey and interview.
Detailed Description
Falling is a significant threat to the health and independent living quality of the elderly. The loss of balance leads to falls. Balance is a very complex neuromuscular reflex function that may be affected by the general condition of the body and one or more impairments in the sensory, nervous, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems. Currently, no test or tool can directly measure balancing capability in the clinical setting. Most clinicians use proxy-based methods to estimate the likelihood of falling, such as the Timed Up and Go Test which has low diagnostic accuracy. Other commonly used observational fall assessment tools (e.g., Berg Balance Scale and Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment) require long administration time, suffering ceiling effects and subjective judgment. The computerized dynamic posturography devices are used in specialized fall assessment and rehabilitation centers. However, these devices are not routinely used in clinical or home settings due to high user costs and special training requirements.
To overcome the abovementioned limitations of extant approaches for measuring dynamic balance ability and predicting the risk of falling. This research attempts to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) enabled device for measuring the dynamic balance ability of older people with a sensor using an optical principle called Frustrated Total Internal Reflection (FTIR). The AI-based algorithm embedded in the device performs the data analysis for balance ability assessment and falling risk prediction.
As a critical part of the research, a large-scale user study is needed to test the validity of the device regarding the dynamic balance ability assessment compared with the common clinical assessment tools used by doctors and other healthcare professionals. In addition, this large-scale user study will also investigate the accuracy of the falling risk prediction provided by the device. Also, the investigators plan to study the factors influencing user engagement in this device through the questionnaire-based survey.
The targeted direct user group of this device is people aged 60 years old or above who live in Hong Kong. The whole study will last six months, and the outcome will be assessed pre-and post-implementation for comparison and validation. The major testing criteria include the device specifications for validity and reliability, user experiences and adoption, prediction model accuracy.
First Round: The participant will be invited to take three tests: A device test, a time up and go test, and a Berg balance test. The device test involves five simple tasks that require participants to complete while using the balance sensor to assess the balance ability. In addition, participants will be required to complete physical data measurements to collect the weight, height, blood pressure, muscle mass, body mass index (BMI), and other physical data. Besides, participants will be required to complete questionnaires.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Na
- Intervention Model
- Single Group
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 60 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •for reference group participants:
- •Ability to communicate with experiment operators (in Chinese or English)
- •Ability to provide informed consent to participate after being given information about the experiment and other information that the participant must know to participate
Exclusion Criteria
- •for reference group participants:
- •Do not fall in the past twelve months
- •Inclusion Criteria for intervention group participants:
- •Ability to communicate with experiment operators (in Chinese or English)
- •Ability to provide informed consent to participate after being given information about the experiment and other information that the participant must know to participate
- •Exclusion Criteria for intervention group participants:
- •Inability to give written informed consent (e.g., illiterate or with cognitive impairment)
- •Inability to stand still without any assistance for 30 seconds
Arms & Interventions
Intervention Group
Older adults with zero time of falls in the past twelve months will be treated as the reference group. Older adults with at least one time of falls in the past twelve months will use the device to assess their balance ability by attending three rounds of the tests.
Intervention: Balance sensor (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Precision assessment of falling risk prediction
Time Frame: Six Months
A primary outcome is the precision assessment of falling risk prediction. The specific measurement variables for this primary outcome are the classification results of high/low falling risk based on the scoring results (a composite result, namely Falling Probability (FP)) of the device test and participants' actual falling incident indicators, including the number of falls, the severity of falling incidents after the device test, and medical history of the participants (say, the falls history within past six months). The FP ranges from zero to one, in which the higher score indicates a higher possibility of fall. The analysis metric for this primary outcome is sensitivity and specificity performance analysis of the device assessment.
Secondary Outcomes
- Validity of the balance ability measurement made by the device(Six Months)
- User Experience(Six Months)
Investigators
Prof. Xi Ning
Chair Professor of Robotics and Automation; Director of Emerging Technologies Institute
The University of Hong Kong
