跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04366583
NCT04366583已完成4 期

Comparison of Hemostatic Efficacy for Argon Plasma Coagulation vs Hemoclipping Following Distilled Water Injection in Treating High-risk Bleeding Ulcers

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 166 人开始时间: 2012年2月9日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
166
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of Participants With Rebleeding

研究概览

简要总结

Endoscopic treatment is recommended for initial hemostasis in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the additional hemostatic efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) has not been widely investigated. We designed a randomized trial comparing APC plus injection therapy vs hemoclipping plus injection therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding.

详细描述

【Goals and Background 】 Endoscopic treatment is recommended for initial hemostasis in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Many endoscopic devices have been demonstrated to be effective in the hemostasis of bleeding ulcers. However, the additional hemostatic efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) after endoscopic injection therapy has not been widely investigated.

【Study】 From Feb. 2012 to April 2016, consecutive patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers, characterized by active bleeding, non-bleeding visible vessels and adherent clots, were admitted to our hospital. They prospectively randomly underwent either APC therapy plus distilled water injection or Hemoclipping plus distilled water injection. Pantoprazole infusion was conducted during the fasting period after endoscopy and orally for 8 weeks to encourage ulcer healing. Episodes of rebleeding were retreated with endoscopic combination therapy. Patients who did not benefit from retreatment underwent emergency surgery or arterial embolization.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • . high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. High-risk bleeding ulcers were defined as participants with stigmata of a bleeding visible vessels (eg, spurting, oozing), a non-bleeding visible vessels (NBVV) or adherent clot.4 A NBVV at endoscopy was defined as a raised red, red-blue or pale hemispheric vessel protruding from the ulcer bed, without active bleeding. An adherent clot was defined as an overlying blood clot that was resistant to vigorous irrigation.

排除标准

  • the presence of another possible bleeding site (eg, gastroesophageal varix, gastric cancer, reflux esophagitis)
  • coexistence of actively severe ill diseases (eg, septic shock, stroke, myocardial infarction, surgical abdomen)
  • treatment with an anticoagulant (eg, warfarin)
  • pregnancy
  • the presence of operated stomach
  • refusal to participate in the study

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Participants With Rebleeding

时间窗: up to 30 days

Rebleeding was observed for a 30-day study period. One or more the following criteria were considered as evidence of recurrent bleeding: aspiration of fresh blood from a nasogastric or orogastric tube; pulse rate over 100 beats per minute; a drop in systolic blood pressure exceeding 30 mmHg; or continue coffee ground emesis or melena with a decline in hemoglobin of at least 2g/dL.

次要结局

  • Surgery or Arterial Embolization(up to 30 days)
  • Mortality(up to 30 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Huay-Min Wang

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Argon Plasma Coagulation vs Hemoclipping for... | 临床试验