Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
Phase 2
Completed
- Conditions
- Kidney Stone
- Interventions
- Procedure: Pneumatic percutaneous nephrolithotomyProcedure: Ultra-sonic percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- Registration Number
- NCT02751281
- Lead Sponsor
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which type of percutaneous nephrolithotomy is better in large kidney stones
- Detailed Description
While there are several retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of different lithotripter in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, there are few prospective studies in this regard. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Ultrasonic versus pneumatic percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of large kidney stones.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 180
Inclusion Criteria
- patients with >2cm kidney stone
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant women
- patients with coagulopathies
- patients with scattered stones who needed several accesses
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description pneumatic percutaneous nephrolithotomy Pneumatic percutaneous nephrolithotomy pneumatic percutaneous nephrolithotomy is type of surgery in treatment of kidney stone Ultra-sonic percutaneous nephrolithotomy Ultra-sonic percutaneous nephrolithotomy Ultra-sonic percutaneous nephrolithotomy is type of surgery in treatment of kidney stone
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method stone free rate 3 months after surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method hemoglobin loss 2 days after surgery