The Effect of Motor Imagery Dosage on Motor Learning in Healthy Adults, A Pilot Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Sponsor
- Ahmed Mahmoud Kadry
- Enrollment
- 27
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Time
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of different durations of Motor Imagery (MI) practice and physical practice on motor performance enhancement in healthy adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does Motor Imagery (MI) practice improve motor performance?
- How do different doses of MI practice (low vs. high) compare to no MI practice in enhancing motor performance?
Participants:
- Be randomly assigned to one of three groups: no MI practice (control group), low dose MI practice (6 minutes per session), or high dose MI practice (12 minutes per session).
- Complete nine sessions over three weeks, practicing a timed mirror tracing task.
- Have their performance measured in each session by the time taken to complete the task and the number of errors made.
Compared the control group, low dose MI group, and high dose MI group to see if there are significant differences in motor performance enhancement, aiming to determine the effectiveness of MI and the optimal dose for practice.
Investigators
Ahmed Mahmoud Kadry
Associate Professor of Physical Therapy
Kafrelsheikh University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •no history of motor dysfunction, coordination disorders, or surgical procedures in the past 6 months
- •scored 4 or less on the Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ) on the non-dominant hand.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Played the target task in the past 6 months
- •Subjects were ambidextrous
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Time
Time Frame: Time was measured at the end of each session, with intervals of 3 session/week for 3 weeks with total of 9 sessions. So, the research ended up with 9 reading for the time.
The time to complete the physical tracing task was measured from when the investigator said 'GO' until the participant returned the pen to the starting point. The physical tracing task is a mirror tracing game that requires participants to trace a star shape viewed through a mirror, going as fast as possible while staying within the lines.
Errors
Time Frame: Errors were counted at the end of each session, with intervals of 3 session/week for 3 weeks with total of 9 sessions. So, the research ended up with 9 reading for the time.
Errors were operationally defined as each time the pen went outside of the shape lines while doing the physical tracing task. Crossing a line and returning to the original trace was counted as one error. Errors were counted by the number of times the pen went outside the lines.