The Effect of Motor Imagery Dosage on Motor Learning in Healthy Adults
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Registration Number
- NCT06299345
- Lead Sponsor
- Ahmed Mahmoud Kadry
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of different durations of Motor Imagery (MI) practice and physical practice on motor performance enhancement in healthy adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does Motor Imagery (MI) practice improve motor performance?
* How do different doses of MI practice (low vs. high) compare to no MI practice in enhancing motor performance?
Participants:
* Be randomly assigned to one of three groups: no MI practice (control group), low dose MI practice (6 minutes per session), or high dose MI practice (12 minutes per session).
* Complete nine sessions over three weeks, practicing a timed mirror tracing task.
* Have their performance measured in each session by the time taken to complete the task and the number of errors made.
Compared the control group, low dose MI group, and high dose MI group to see if there are significant differences in motor performance enhancement, aiming to determine the effectiveness of MI and the optimal dose for practice.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 27
- no history of motor dysfunction, coordination disorders, or surgical procedures in the past 6 months
- scored 4 or less on the Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ) on the non-dominant hand.
- Played the target task in the past 6 months
- Subjects were ambidextrous
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time Time was measured at the end of each session, with intervals of 3 session/week for 3 weeks with total of 9 sessions. So, the research ended up with 9 reading for the time. The time to complete the physical tracing task was measured from when the investigator said 'GO' until the participant returned the pen to the starting point. The physical tracing task is a mirror tracing game that requires participants to trace a star shape viewed through a mirror, going as fast as possible while staying within the lines.
Errors Errors were counted at the end of each session, with intervals of 3 session/week for 3 weeks with total of 9 sessions. So, the research ended up with 9 reading for the time. Errors were operationally defined as each time the pen went outside of the shape lines while doing the physical tracing task. Crossing a line and returning to the original trace was counted as one error. Errors were counted by the number of times the pen went outside the lines.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Concordia University Wisconsin
🇺🇸Mequon, Wisconsin, United States
Kafrelshaikh University
🇪🇬Kafr Ash Shaykh, Egypt
Concordia University Wisconsin🇺🇸Mequon, Wisconsin, United States