MedPath

Financial Incentives Telephone Education and Skills Trial in African Americans With Diabetes (FITEST)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Noninsulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus, Type II
Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Adult-Onset Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
Behavioral: High Frequency Financial Incentive
Behavioral: Moderate Frequency Financial Incentive
Behavioral: Low Frequency Financial Incentive
Registration Number
NCT02722499
Lead Sponsor
State University of New York at Buffalo
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of financial incentives augmented telephone-delivered diabetes education and skills training intervention in improving HbA1c levels in African Americans (AA) with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Detailed Description

African Americans with T2DM have higher prevalence of diabetes, poorer metabolic control, and greater risk for complications and death compared to White Americans. HbA1c is the primary marker for glycemic control and is a strong independent predictor of development of complications and increased mortality in T2DM. Key self-care behaviors that influence glycemic control (and HbA1c) include diet, physical activity, self-monitoring of blood glucose and medication adherence. Systematic review of multiple RCTs show that self-care interventions that include diabetes education and skills training are effective in improving metabolic control in diabetes. Recent findings indicate that patients with diabetes, especially ethnic minority patients, prefer telephone-delivered diabetes education to group visits or internet-based education. Multiple RCTs have documented the effectiveness of telephone-delivered self-care interventions in T2DM.

The overarching aim of this proposal is test the efficacy of three financial incentive structures in combination with technology intensified diabetes education and skills training intervention on blood pressure and quality of life in AAs with T2DM. 60 AAs with T2DM will be randomized to three groups with varying frequency of financial incentives: 1) High Frequency: financial incentives for weekly uploads plus average glucose, incentives for weekly attendance to educational sessions, and incentives at the end of the study for meeting HbA1c goals 2) Moderate Frequency: financial incentives for weekly uploads plus average glucose, and incentives at the end of the study for meeting HbA1c goals, and 3) Low Frequency: financial incentives at the end of the study for meeting HbA1c goals.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥21 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of T2DM and HbA1c ≥8% at the screening visit
  • Self-identified as AA
  • Subject must be willing to use the FORA monitoring system for 3 months
  • Subjects must be able to communicate in English
  • Subjects must have access to a telephone (landline for data uploads) for the study period
Exclusion Criteria
  • Mental confusion on interview suggesting significant dementia
  • Participation in other diabetes clinical trials
  • Alcohol or drug abuse/dependency
  • Active psychosis or acute mental disorder
  • Life expectancy <12 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
High Frequency Financial IncentiveHigh Frequency Financial IncentiveThis arm will receive telephone delivered diabetes education and skills training in combination with the high frequency incentive structure
Moderate Frequency Financial IncentiveModerate Frequency Financial IncentiveThis arm will receive telephone delivered diabetes education and skills training in combination with the moderate frequency incentive structure
Low Frequency Financial IncentiveLow Frequency Financial IncentiveThis arm will receive telephone delivered diabetes education and skills training in combination with the low frequency incentive structure
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
HbA1cBaseline to 3 months

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): blood specimens will be collected at the screening visit, as well as the 3-months. Time points used in calculation are baseline to 3 month.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Resource Utilization and CostBaseline to 3 months

Resource Utilization \& Cost: Information on hospitalizations, physician/professional visits, and medications will be captured. Time points used in calculation are baseline to 3 month.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical College of Wisconsin

🇺🇸

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath