rhBMP-2 Versus Vivigen in Lumbar Fusion Procedures
- Conditions
- Lumbar Spine Degeneration
- Interventions
- Biological: 5cc Vivigen and local autograftBiological: Small kit rhBMP-2 with local autograft
- Registration Number
- NCT03527966
- Lead Sponsor
- Virtua Health, Inc.
- Brief Summary
This study is aimed at comparing the overall efficacy (clinical and radiographic) of Vivigen, a novel cellular allograft product, and rhBMP-2 when utilized in lumbar fusion procedures.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to compare the overall efficacy (clinical outcome and radiographic fusion) of Vivigen (cellular allograft product) and rhBMP-2 in patients who undergo a single level lumbar instrumented fusion. Specifically, when compared to their control group counterparts treated to rhBMP-2, we hypothesize that the intervention group administered Vivigen would, following surgery, experience:
1. Comparable mean postoperative leg/back pain score, where the pain scores are obtained using the numeric rating scale of 0-no pain, to 10-worst pain possible
2. Comparable inpatient length of stay (LOS)
3. Comparable postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (0-no disability, to 100-maximum disability possible), two weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
4. Comparable fusion rates, evaluated via CT scan I year postoperatively
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 3
- Age 18 or older;
- Diagnosed with lumbar degenerative/isthmic spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease with axial low back pain and neurologic symptoms, failed conservative treatment and eligible for a single level lumbar instrumented fusion;
- Willing to provide informed consent, participate in study, and comply with study protocol.
- Pregnant or contemplating pregnancy prior to surgery;
- Serious spinal conditions (e.g. spinal cord compression, cauda equina syndrome, spinal infection, spinal tumor, spinal fracture, inflammatory or systemic spinal arthritis);
- Surgery involving more than 2 vertebral levels;
- Worker's compensation or personal injury related to lumbar spine (treatment outcomes may be affected by patient's personal interests; could also run into potential issues with reimbursement).
- Lactating women
- Patients who have a known or suspected allergy to Gentamicin Sulfate, Meropenem, Vancomycin, Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO), and Human Serum Albumin
- Immune compromised patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intervention group - 5cc Vivigen and local autograft 5cc Vivigen and local autograft - Control group - small kit rhBMP-2 with local autograft Small kit rhBMP-2 with local autograft -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score Up to 1 year post surgery The ODI is one of the most commonly utilized condition-specific measures of disability used in the management of spinal disorders (0-no disability, to 100-maximum disability possible)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Postoperative Leg/Back Pain Score Average of 3 days in hospital Pain scores are obtained using the numeric rating scale of 0-no pain, to 10-worst pain possible
Mean Inpatient Length of Stay Average of 3 days in hospital Fusion Rates, Evaluated Via CT Scan I Year Postoperatively 1 year post surgery
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Virtua Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸Mount Holly, New Jersey, United States