NCT01190618已完成不适用
Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Repair With the Elevate Prolapse Repair Kit
Larry Sirls1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 417 人开始时间: 2010年8月最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 417
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Comparison of Outcomes
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes in patients having vaginal prolapse repair with the Elevate prolapse repair kit and compare these outcomes to patients who had a repair with Prolift. .
详细描述
The investigators hypothesize that the less invasive Elevate mesh results in a shorter operative time, lower blood loss, complications, postoperative pain and earlier discharge from the hospital.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Only
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Women who have had a vaginal repair with Elevate prolapse repair kit
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Comparison of Outcomes
时间窗: 3 Months
To evaluate outcomes in patients having vaginal prolapse repair with the Elevate prolapse repair kit and compare these outcomes to patients who had a repair with Profift.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Larry Sirls
Principal Investigator
William Beaumont Hospitals
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
4 期
Outcomes of Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Graft Reinforced Anterior Prolapse RepairCystoceleUrinary IncontinenceUterine ProlapseNCT00535301Kaiser Permanente75
已完成
不适用
Effects of vaginal prolapse surgery on vaginal microcirculatioPelvic organ prolapse10047789NL-OMON44209Academisch Medisch Centrum10
撤回
不适用
Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by PIVS Versus Surgeon Cut MeshPelvic Floor ProlapseNCT01387685Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
招募中
不适用
Transvaginal Mesh vs. Laparoscopic Colposacropexy- StudyProlapse, Vaginal VaultNCT04478747Helsinki University Central Hospital318
尚未招募
不适用
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Modified Ischial Spinous Fascia Fixation and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ ProlapsePelvic Organ ProlapseNCT06418451Lan Zhu370
