NCT01387685撤回不适用
Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by PIVS Versus Surgeon Cut Mesh
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Satisfaction with study outcome
研究概览
简要总结
Women with pelvic floor prolapse who underwent surgery with mesh will be enrolled. The investigators will compare data from the chart, telephone interviews and physical examinations between those who underwent mesh placement to those who underwent placement of PIVS.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 95 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Women who underwent surgery for pelvic floor prolapse
排除标准
- •Women who did not have surgery for pelvic floor prolapse.
结局指标
主要结局
Satisfaction with study outcome
时间窗: six to twelve months after surgery
次要结局
- Side effects of the surgery: pain, vaginal erosion by tape, bleeding(Within six to twelve months after study)
研究者
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Transvaginal Mesh vs. Laparoscopic Colposacropexy- StudyProlapse, Vaginal VaultNCT04478747Helsinki University Central Hospital318
撤回
不适用
Prolift Versus IVS for Pelvic Floor ProlapsePelvic Floor ProlapseNCT01383291Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
已完成
不适用
ProViS (Prolift+M and Vita Sexualis) StudyPelvic Organ ProlapseNCT01997996Dr. med. Tanja Hülder18
已完成
不适用
Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Repair With ElevateVaginal ProlapseNCT01190618Larry Sirls417
已完成
不适用
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.Pelvic Organ ProlapseNCT00372190Radboud University Medical Center194