NCT01383291撤回不适用
Postoperative Comparison Between Posterior Prolift Mesh Placement and Posterior IVS Sling Placement
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 试验地点
- 2
研究概览
简要总结
- Women who underwent mesh or sling procedures to correct pelvic organ prolapse will be enrolled.
- Their data will be collected from the files.
- Comparison between two groups will be carried our: Those who underwent a posterior IVS and those who underwent posterior prolift procedure.
- The data will be obtained by questionaires by a telephone interview by a physician who did not participate in the surgery.
- Follow-up physical examination data will also be obtained.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 95 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Women who previously underwent surgery for pelvic floor prolapse at least a year before
排除标准
- •Women who did not have surgery for pelvic floor prolapse
研究者
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Anterior Prolift Versus Posterior Prolift for Pelvic Floor ProlapsePelvic Floor ProlapseNCT01392417Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya140
撤回
不适用
Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by PIVS Versus Surgeon Cut MeshPelvic Floor ProlapseNCT01387685Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
招募中
不适用
Comparison of Posterior and Anterior Approach to Sacrospinous Ligament Apical Fixation - Randomized Controlled TrialPelvic Organ ProlapseSurgical Procedure, UnspecifiedNCT04306250HaEmek Medical Center, Israel280
招募中
不适用
Transvaginal Mesh vs. Laparoscopic Colposacropexy- StudyProlapse, Vaginal VaultNCT04478747Helsinki University Central Hospital318
已完成
不适用
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.Pelvic Organ ProlapseNCT00372190Radboud University Medical Center194