NCT01392417已完成不适用
Anterior Prolift Versus Posterior Prolift for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 140
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Symptoms of pelvic floor prolapse
研究概览
简要总结
Women who had surgery for pelvic floor prolapse underwent surgery by anterior Prolift or Posterior prolift at least a year after the surgery.
The data from the charts and from telephone conversations with the patients will be entered to a database. Physical examination data will also be incorporated.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 95 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Women who underwent surgery by anterior Prolift or posterior Prolift for pelvic floor prolapse
排除标准
- •Women who did not have surgery by Prolift for pelvic floor prolapse
结局指标
主要结局
Symptoms of pelvic floor prolapse
时间窗: One year after surgery
We will question the women if they have a feeling of a mass protruding through the labia. Physical examination data will also be incorporated.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
menahem neuman
Principal Investigator
Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
撤回
不适用
Prolift Versus IVS for Pelvic Floor ProlapsePelvic Floor ProlapseNCT01383291Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
招募中
不适用
Comparison of Posterior and Anterior Approach to Sacrospinous Ligament Apical Fixation - Randomized Controlled TrialPelvic Organ ProlapseSurgical Procedure, UnspecifiedNCT04306250HaEmek Medical Center, Israel280
已完成
4 期
Outcomes of Anterior Colporrhaphy Versus Graft Reinforced Anterior Prolapse RepairCystoceleUrinary IncontinenceUterine ProlapseNCT00535301Kaiser Permanente75
撤回
不适用
Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by PIVS Versus Surgeon Cut MeshPelvic Floor ProlapseNCT01387685Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
已完成
不适用
Comparison of Suturing Technique Types on Pubocervical Fascia at Colpographhy Anterior for Cystocele RepairPelvic Organ ProlapseNCT05444023Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital60