Subthreshold SCS or BMT
- Conditions
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
- Interventions
- Other: Best Medical TreatmentOther: Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation
- Registration Number
- NCT05169047
- Lead Sponsor
- Moens Maarten
- Brief Summary
Given the substantial socioeconomic impact of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) implantations and given that currently no direct high-quality evidence with a relevant outcome measurement is available to guide the treatment choice between subthreshold SCS versus best medical treatment in patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2), we here propose a scientifically well-constructed randomized controlled trial to answer this question.
The primary scientific objective is to examine whether subthreshold SCS, compared to best medical treatment, provided to patients with PSPS-T2 results in a higher percentage of clinical holistic responders at 6 months. The secondary objective of the study is to examine if subthreshold SCS compared with BMT is having more efficacy in improving patients' individual competencies for self-management, increasing the likelihood to return to work, work status and healthcare expenditure, improving pain relief, obtaining pain medication reduction, decreasing anxiety and depression, increasing quality of life and decreasing disability.
- Detailed Description
After filling in the questionnaires at the 6 months follow-up visit, patients could change treatment groups (in both directions). This decision will be a shared decisions between patient and treating physician in case the randomized intervention did not provided enough pain relief.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 114
- Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II (PSPS-T2)
- Chronic pain as a result of PSPS-T2 that exists for at least 6 months with a pain intensity of at least 4/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale, refractory to conservative treatment.
- PSPS-T2 patients eligible for subthreshold SCS
- Age > 18 years
- Patient has been informed of the study procedures and has given written informed consent
- Patient willing to comply with study protocol including attending the study visits
- Expected inability of patients to receive or properly operate the spinal cord stimulation system
- Evidence of an active psychiatric disorder
- Suffering from another chronic illness characterised by chronic generalized widespread pain (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, scleroderma).
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Best Medical Treatment Best Medical Treatment - Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical holistic responder status The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. The clinical holistic responder status as a composite measure represents the global effect of a treatment, based on a combination of questionnaires.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall pain intensity with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Overall pain, defined as a combination of back and leg pain, but not pain from other body parts, measured with the VAS (100mm)
Work status The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Work status is evaluated with a self-designed questionnaire
Patients' individual competencies for self-management The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Patient activation measure-13 (PAM) is a 13-item instrument which assesses self-reported behaviour, knowledge, and confidence for self-management of one's health.
Pain medication use The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Open question regarding the dosage, frequency and type of pain medication
Functional disability The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. The functional disabilities will be assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Health related quality of life The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Health related quality of life, evaluated with the EuroQol with five dimensions and 5 levels
Healthcare utilisation. The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Healthcare expenditure will be investigated by self-reporting methods.
Patient global impression of change Evaluated at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Patients will be asked to quantify the impression of change after treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC).
Anxiety and Depression. The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. The hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will measure symptoms of anxiety and depression
Trial Locations
- Locations (5)
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
🇧🇪Jette, Belgium
Emmaüs, AZ Sint-Maarten
🇧🇪Mechelen, Belgium
AZ Delta
🇧🇪Roeselare, Belgium
AZ Turnhout
🇧🇪Turnhout, Belgium
Jessa Ziekenhuis
🇧🇪Hasselt, Belgium