MedPath

Trial of New Pretreatment Method in Transnasal Endoscopy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pretreatment Method of Transnasal Endoscopy
Interventions
Procedure: pretreatment method for transnasal endoscopy
Registration Number
NCT01708967
Lead Sponsor
Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital
Brief Summary

This study designed for compare efficacy of following two anesthetic method for transnasal endoscopy

* "Catheter-free method"

* "Catheter-insertion method"

Detailed Description

1. Check of the medical history (both method)

1. underlying systemic disease

2. drug allergy

3. anticoagulant or antiplatelet use

2. Premedication (both method)

1. taking premedication contain dimethylpolysiloxane, pronase, sodium bicarbonate for improved endoscopic visualization

2. spraying naphazolin acetate into nasal cavity for decrease secretion

3. Different anesthetic method for transnasal endoscopy

1. "Catheter-free method" : spraying epinephrine into nasal cavity

2. "Catheter-insertion method" : spraying both epinephrine and lidocaine into nasal cavity

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Routine check-up patients
Exclusion Criteria
  • nasal operation, an allergy, a possibility of hemorrhage

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Catheter-free methodpretreatment method for transnasal endoscopyWe explored success rate, side effects, and vital signs in patients with catether-free method. Intervention: one-time spray of epinephrine (1cc) plus 4% lidocaine (4cc)
Catheter insertion methodpretreatment method for transnasal endoscopyWe explored success rate, side effects, and vital signs in patients with catether insertion method : use both spray and catheter
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Success Rate of Transnasal EndoscopyDuring transnasal endoscopy, up to 1 hours

We difine the success of transnasal endoscopy as follows: the pateint underwent transnasal endoscopy without signicant complaint nor side effects.

We difine the failure of transnasal endoscopy as follows: the patient cannot tolerate insertion of the endoscope; the patient presents side effects such as epistaxis, pain, or a decrease in O2 saturation; and the endoscope cannot pass through the nasal or oral cavity.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Vital Signsbefore, during, and after transnasal endoscopy

Blood pressure, heart rate, and O2 saturation were assessed.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital

🇰🇷

Chuncheon, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath