Impact of Joint Crisis Plan
- Conditions
- Mental Disorders
- Interventions
- Procedure: Joint Crisis Plan
- Registration Number
- NCT03984682
- Brief Summary
For some patients in department psychiatric, isolation measures are put in place. But the measures is not pleasant for the patient or for the care team.
That's why care team are trying to find ways to improve patient care, including asking them how they would like to be treated.
One of the solutions is called the Joint Crisis Plan. A Joint Crisis Plan is a personalized procedure for a patient. It describes the attitude, the care, the measures in case of crisis with the patient and his family. Patients indicate their wishes regarding their care. However, there is no real scientific proof of the effectiveness of this Joint Crisis Plan, especially to reduce isolation measures.
- Detailed Description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy of the Joint Crisis Plan.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 96
- Patients >18 years
- Patients having had at least one isolation, restraint or forced hospitalization measure in the 24 months before inclusion
- Followed by nurses of a mobile team of psychiatry sector Saint Etienne
- Social security affiliation
- Signed informed consent
- Patient having already had a Joint Crisis Plan for less than 6 months.
- Patient does not speak French
- Pregnant and lactating women
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Experimental group Joint Crisis Plan Patients will benefit from regular care + Joint Crisis Plan
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of isolation Months: 12 Measured in hours.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of physical restraint Months: 12 Measured in hours
Experience of discrimination and stigmatization Months: 12 Measured by the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness. This scale is a 29 items scale with stigma graded on a 4 point scale (Strongly disagree-1, Disagree-2, Agree-3 and strongly agree-4) which are divided into fivecomponents/domains (alienation, stereotype endorsement, perceived discrimination, social withdrawal and stigma resistance). Higher scores indicate higher level of self stigma.
Number of violent events Months: 12 Number of emergency room visits for psychiatric opinion Months: 12 Number of hospitalizations Months: 12 Number of isolation Months: 12 Perception of constraint Months: 12 Measured by the MacArthur Coercion Scale. Each "True" = 0, and each "False" = 1, perceived cohesion scale score is between 0 and 5, Negative pressures scale score is between 0 and 6, Voice scale score is between 0 and 3, Affective Reactions to Hospitalization score is between 0 and 6.
Adhesion and feeling of nurses in relation to Joint Crisis Plan Months: 12 Measured by focus-groups and individual interviews of nurses
Number of physical restraints Months: 12
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHU Saint-Etienne
🇫🇷Saint-Étienne, France