MedPath

Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Joint Replacement

Recruiting
Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Interventions
Procedure: Joint replacement
Registration Number
NCT04691466
Lead Sponsor
Nicolaus Copernicus University
Brief Summary

Patient-related outcomes were originally designed to measure outcomes in clinical studies. They were not developed to predict outcomes, however, different studies showed close association between values achieved preoperatively and postoperative outcomes. The aim of the present trial is to identify patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory outcomes after joint replacement and to investigate whether there are any potential predicting potential in preoperative results of the patient-related outcomes and if there exist other predicting factors for functional recovery or treatment failure after joint replacement surgery.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1000
Inclusion Criteria

Patients with primary or secondary hip- and knee osteoarthritis undergoing joint replacement surgery.

Exclusion Criteria
  1. An inability to understand the Polish language,
  2. Presence of neuromuscular disease and cognitive impairment,
  3. Having a prosthesis in another joint of the ipsilateral or contralateral lower limb placed within 6 months before the current surgery,
  4. Having rheumatoid arthritis,
  5. Symptoms in several joints (hip, knee or ankle) with expected total joint arthroplasty within 1 year.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
HIP_RJoint replacementPatients undergoing hip replacement surgery
KNEE_RJoint replacementPatients undergoing knee replacement surgery
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of the patients' opinion about their knee. Score change over time12 months

Change between the following assessments as measured with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients undergoing total knee replacement; 0-100 points, worst to best; minimal clinical difference (MCD) = 10 points.

Assessment of the patients' opinion about their hip. Change over time12 months

Change between the following assessments as measured with the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in patients undergoing total hip replacement; 0-100 points, worst to best; minimal clinical difference (MCD) = 10 points.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain intensity. Change over time12 months

Measured with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); 0-10 points, worst to best.

Range of motion.12 months

Assessment of range of motion in hips and knees, respectively, in following assessments; degrees.

Assessment of the quality of life. Score change over time12 months

Results of the generic PROM, the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) in both, patients undergoing hip and knee replacement; 0-100 points, worst to best.

Hip abductors muscle strength. Change over time12 months

Determination of the Trendelenburg's sign in patients undergoing total hip replacement in following assessments; positive or negative.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellońska 13/15

🇵🇱

Bydgoszcz, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath