Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Joint Replacement
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, Knee
- Interventions
- Procedure: Joint replacement
- Registration Number
- NCT04691466
- Lead Sponsor
- Nicolaus Copernicus University
- Brief Summary
Patient-related outcomes were originally designed to measure outcomes in clinical studies. They were not developed to predict outcomes, however, different studies showed close association between values achieved preoperatively and postoperative outcomes. The aim of the present trial is to identify patients with satisfactory and unsatisfactory outcomes after joint replacement and to investigate whether there are any potential predicting potential in preoperative results of the patient-related outcomes and if there exist other predicting factors for functional recovery or treatment failure after joint replacement surgery.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1000
Patients with primary or secondary hip- and knee osteoarthritis undergoing joint replacement surgery.
- An inability to understand the Polish language,
- Presence of neuromuscular disease and cognitive impairment,
- Having a prosthesis in another joint of the ipsilateral or contralateral lower limb placed within 6 months before the current surgery,
- Having rheumatoid arthritis,
- Symptoms in several joints (hip, knee or ankle) with expected total joint arthroplasty within 1 year.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description HIP_R Joint replacement Patients undergoing hip replacement surgery KNEE_R Joint replacement Patients undergoing knee replacement surgery
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment of the patients' opinion about their knee. Score change over time 12 months Change between the following assessments as measured with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients undergoing total knee replacement; 0-100 points, worst to best; minimal clinical difference (MCD) = 10 points.
Assessment of the patients' opinion about their hip. Change over time 12 months Change between the following assessments as measured with the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in patients undergoing total hip replacement; 0-100 points, worst to best; minimal clinical difference (MCD) = 10 points.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain intensity. Change over time 12 months Measured with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); 0-10 points, worst to best.
Range of motion. 12 months Assessment of range of motion in hips and knees, respectively, in following assessments; degrees.
Assessment of the quality of life. Score change over time 12 months Results of the generic PROM, the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) in both, patients undergoing hip and knee replacement; 0-100 points, worst to best.
Hip abductors muscle strength. Change over time 12 months Determination of the Trendelenburg's sign in patients undergoing total hip replacement in following assessments; positive or negative.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellońska 13/15
🇵🇱Bydgoszcz, Poland