Comparison and evaluation of post-surgical outcome of mandibular third molar surgery by conventional rotary device and piezoelectric surgery.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Impacted teeth.Impacted teethK01.1
- Registration Number
- IRCT20180515039664N2
- Lead Sponsor
- Zahedan University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Existance of impacted third lower molar in degree of A or B and Class I or II of impaction (Pell & Gregory classification)
Conscious consent to participate in the study
No decay
Absence of any systemic disease
No pregnancy or lactation
Exclusion Criteria
Any factor that prevents the patient from continuing to study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after surgery. Method of measurement: VAS pain scale.;Trismus. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical examination.;Trismus. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical examinaion.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method