Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05210647
NCT05210647CompletedNot Applicable

Analysis of Surgical Outcome of Robotic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopy Surgery. Retrospective Case Control Study in Single Institute.

Taichung Veterans General Hospital1 site in 1 country291 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
291
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
surgical outcomes

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To analysis surgical outcome between robotic and laparoscopy colon and rectal surgery. Retrospective case-control study of single institute.

Detailed Description

Microinvasive surgery bring minor pain, faster recovery and comparable oncological outcome. Robotic surgery seems to be superior in precise dissection then before. This study compare robot assisted to laparoscopy surgery in colon and rectal disease. To analysis the surgical outcome and prognostic factors.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Control
Time Perspective
Retrospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • for colon and rectal disease, using conventional laparoscopy and da Vinci Xi robot system.

Exclusion Criteria

  • emergent operation, combined other open surgery, for non-colorectal disease, carcinomatosis found to be unsuitable for surgery once peritoneum entered, taTME in laparoscopy group and other robot system in robotic surgery group.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

surgical outcomes

Time Frame: 2019.1.1-2022.1.8

operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, complication rate.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Robotic Assisted Colon and Rectal Surgery... | Clinical Trial