MedPath

The Implementation of Computer-aided Detection in Training Improves the Quality of Future Colonoscopies

Completed
Conditions
Quality Indicators, Health Care
Colonoscopy Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Interventions
Other: AI-ehnanced endoscopy training
Other: Conventional endoscopy training
Registration Number
NCT06623331
Lead Sponsor
Jagiellonian University
Brief Summary

Computer-aided detection (CADe) based on artificial intelligence (AI) may improve colonoscopy quality. An increasing number of young endoscopists are trained in an AI environment. However its impact on trainees' future outcomes remains unclear. The study aimed to evaluate the quality indicators of endoscopists trained in an AI environment compared to those trained conventionally.

Detailed Description

Computer-aided detection (CADe) based on artificial intelligence (AI) may improve colonoscopy quality. An increasing number of young endoscopists are trained in an AI environment. However its impact on trainees' future outcomes remains unclear. The study aimed to evaluate the quality indicators of endoscopists trained in an AI environment compared to those trained conventionally. A study included 6,000 adult patients who underwent a colonoscopy for various reasons. The study retrospectively evaluated the first 1,000 procedures performed by six endoscopists after completing training relying entirely on endoscopists' detection skills without AI enhancement. Three of those young endoscopists were trained with CADe, and three without additional assistance. Quality indicators were assessed in both groups. The morphology of detected polyps was evaluated to determine the influence of AI-enhanced training on laterally spreading tumors (LST) detection rate.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
6000
Inclusion Criteria
  • adult participants who underwent a colonoscopy for various reasons performed by specific endoscopists that were assessed in terms of quality indicators
Exclusion Criteria
  • a history of bowel resection
  • confirmed inflammatory bowel disease
  • suspicion of polyps or cancer in other imaging tests
  • suspicion of familial adenomatous polyposis

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group AAI-ehnanced endoscopy trainingColonoscopies performed by endoscopists trained in AI-ehnanced environment. In the trial the quality indicators are measured after completing training, without AI enhancement.
Group BConventional endoscopy trainingColonoscopies performed by endoscopists trained conventionally. In the trial the quality indicators are measured after completing training, without AI enhancement.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Serrated polyp detection rate (SDR)During the colonoscopy examination

The percentage of colonoscopies when the serrated polyp was found

withdrawal timeDuring the colonoscopy examination

The time from the cecal intubation to the end of the examination

Cecal intubation rate (CIR)During the colonoscopy examination

The percentage of colonoscopies with successful cecal intubations

Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)During the colonoscopy examination

The percentage of colonoscopies when the adenoma was found

Advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR)During the colonoscopy examination

The percentage of colonoscopies when the advanced adenoma (\>10mm) was found

Adenoma per colonoscopy score (APC)During the colonoscopy examination

The average number of adenomas detected in a single colonoscopy

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Laterally spreading tumor detection rateDuring the colonoscopy examination

The percentage of colonoscopies when the laterally spreading tumor lesion was found

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Jagiellonian University

🇵🇱

Kraków, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath