MedPath

Effect of Real-time Computer-aided System (ENDO-AID) on Adenoma Detection in Endoscopist-in-training

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Screening Colonoscopy
Interventions
Device: ENDO-AID CADe
Registration Number
NCT04838951
Lead Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Brief Summary

The investigator's hypothesis is that a CADe system (ENDO-AID) would improve the adenoma detection rate in junior endoscopists.

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common and second most lethal cancer in Hong Kong with more than 5,600 new cases and 2,300 deaths annually. Colonoscopy with polypectomy has shown to reduce CRC-related mortality by 53%. However, high polyp miss rates were reported to be up to 26% for adenomas and 9% for advanced adenomas in standard colonoscopies. Risk factors included proximal location, serrate or flat lesions, poor bowel preparation and short withdrawal time (\<6 minutes). Insufficient trainee experience was also associated with a higher adenoma miss rate. A significant proportion of interval CRC was attributed to the missed lesions during index colonoscopy leading to adverse patient outcomes.

As a result, various techniques were developed to improve adenoma detection rate (ADR) during colonoscopies. Techniques including water exchange method, second examination of the right colon (retroflexion or second forward view)and cap/cuff-assisted colonoscopies were proven to increase ADR effectively. However, these techniques were operator-dependent requiring certain level of expertise.

Recently, artificial intelligence and computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) systems have developed rapidly around the globe. These systems can provide real-time CADe by flagging the suspected lesions to endoscopists, with the adoption of deep learning or convoluted neural networks. A number of prospective randomized clinical trials reported a significant increase in ADR in CADe group. The number of adenoma detected per colonoscopy was consistently higher among different polyp sizes, location and morphology. The ADR increment was particularly higher for diminutive adenomas smaller than 5mm.

Nevertheless, most of the aforementioned studies only involved senior endoscopists for the procedures. Theoretically, the senior endoscopists were more skillful to expose colonic mucosa and more experienced to distinguish the false positive computer signals, leading to an enhanced performance of CADe in real-time colonoscopies. The effect of CADe on inexperienced junior endoscopists performing colonoscopies remains largely unknown.

In this single-blind randomized study, the investigators aim to evaluate the effect of a new CADe system (ENDO-AID) on adenoma detection and quality improvement in junior endoscopists.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
856
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Aged 18 years old or above;
  2. They require elective colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, polyp surveillance, or investigation of symptoms such as anemia or gastrointestinal bleeding;
  3. Written informed consent obtained.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Contraindication to colonoscopy (e.g. intestinal obstruction or perforation)
  2. Contraindication or conditions precluding polyp resection (e.g. active gastrointestinal bleeding, significant bleeding tendency, uninterrupted anticoagulation or dual antiplatelets)
  3. Scheduled staged procedure for polypectomy or biopsy
  4. Previous colonic resection
  5. Personal history of colorectal cancer
  6. Personal history of polyposis syndrome
  7. Personal history of inflammatory bowel disease
  8. Advanced comorbid conditions (defined as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 4 or above)
  9. Pregnancy
  10. Unable to obtain informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intervention armENDO-AID CADeCADe system will be used during withdrawal phase of colonoscopy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ADRDuring the colonoscopy

adenoma detection rate

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total procedural timeDuring the colonoscopy

Total procedural time

ADR for adenomas of different sizesDuring the colonoscopy

\<5mm, 5-10mm, \>10mm

ADR for adenomas of different colonic segmentsDuring the colonoscopy

caecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum

Mean number of adenomas per colonoscopyDuring the colonoscopy

Mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy

Advanced adenoma detection rateDuring the colonoscopy

Advanced adenoma detection rate

Sessile serrate lesion (SSL) detection rateDuring the colonoscopy

Sessile serrate lesion (SSL) detection rate

Polyp detection rateDuring the colonoscopy

Polyp detection rate

Non-neoplastic resection rateDuring the colonoscopy

defined as absence of adenoma or SSL within resected specimen

Missed polyp rateDuring the colonoscopy

defined as a polyp which the junior endoscopist fails to recognize and withdraws the endoscope to next colonic segment, but detected by the supervisor

False positive rateDuring the colonoscopy

defined as computer artifacts due to colonic mucosal wall or bowel content lasting for \>2 seconds

Cecal intubation timeDuring the colonoscopy

Cecal intubation time

Withdrawal timeDuring the colonoscopy

excluding interventions

Percentage of change in ADR in relation to the personal experience in colonoscopyDuring the colonoscopy

Percentage of change in ADR in relation to the personal experience in colonoscopy based on number of procedures performed \<200 vs 200-500

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Prince of Wales Hospital

🇭🇰

Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath