Comparison of Two Different Healing Abutments in Single Posterior Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Implants
- Sponsor
- Alexandria University
- Enrollment
- 24
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Measurement of peri-implant soft tissues volume
- Status
- Active, Not Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 9 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months of the use of a prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg in comparison to customized healing abutment.
Detailed Description
Volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months of the use of a prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg with convex emergence profile in comparison to customized healing abutment with concave emergence profile.
Investigators
Rania Elsayed
Principal investigator
Alexandria University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult patients who are classified as ASA I or II physical status and require mandibular single implants (single missing mandibular posterior teeth) with:
- •Proper bone height and width.
- •Adequate zone of keratinized tissue (at least 2 mm)
Exclusion Criteria
- •Any systematic disease as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or metabolic bone diseases
- •Pregnancy and Lactation
- •A history of head and neck radiation treatment.
- •Chronic periodontal diseases.
- •Poor oral hygiene (Silness-Löe plaque index score 2 and 3)
- •Parafunctional habits.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Measurement of peri-implant soft tissues volume
Time Frame: 3 months
Each participant will undergo volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months healing either after using prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg in comparison to customized healing abutment using a 3D meteorology software (GOM inspect). It will be measured in millimeter cube